The Whig theory, put into place after the Glorious Revolution, put a premium on the idea of civic virtue, placing the public good above personal interest. To promote such virtue, one needed a society in which property ownership was widespread. An agricultural nation, where farming was thought to encourage honesty, frugality, and independence, was less likely to become corrupt than a society dependent on commerce and manufacturing. In an agrarian society, politics would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be equally affected by whatever laws they passed. This would prevent them from tyrannizing over the people by passing oppressive laws.
<span>The Whig view of politics was not democratic. It assumed that only men who owned property had a sufficient permanent stake in society to be trusted to vote.</span>
I think the answer is... C. Your welcome!
1. I would say Beneficial because when he discovered the "west Indies" he brought back much treasures and gained spain lots of territory.
2. It would have been different because he could've just asked another country or he could have gave up and someone else might have found the new world.
3. This question is up to you...
In both cases, neither the French nor the Germans succeeded. Due to lack of supplies, harsh weather conditions, and being in unfamiliar territory, both the French and the Germans were vulnerable to counterattack by the Russians, and eventually defeated.
