I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Because you want to make sure that u have some sort of stability and that u won’t be helpless after you move out
What this sentence that was made by Voltaire means is that the periods after the year 1500 was full of violence an a lot of blood shed.
<h3>What violence did Voltaire mention?</h3>
Voltaire used the speech to paint a picture of violence that could erupt in the human race. He was one of the enlightenment personalities that existed. He saw the many deficiencies that was existent in human nature. This was what made him to make such a speech.
Hence we can conclude that the meaning of this quote tells us that there would be violence and blood shed by using the the ways that the man made the speech.
Read more on Voltaire here: brainly.com/question/13331947
#SPJ1
Sbsbsbshgsgdgdjdjskksjdfgdgxz
But how do we search profiles/accounts?
