1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
4 years ago
8

The term genetic engineering originally referred to various processes used to modify and manipulate organisms via heredity and r

eproduction. Starting during the latter part of the 20th century, however, the term refers more specifically to recombinant DNA methods in which DNA molecules from different sources are combined in-vitro then inserted into a host organism, ultimately altering the organism’s DNA. Recombinant DNA technology is based around restriction enzymes that were discovered by the Swiss microbiologist Werner Arber in 1968. True or false?
History
1 answer:
mixer [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

During the late 1950s and early 1960s, Werner Arber and several others extended the work of an earlier Nobel laureate, Salvador Luria, who observed that bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria) not only induce hereditary mutations in their bacterial hosts but at the same time undergo hereditary mutations themselves. Werner Arber’s research was concentrated on the action of protective enzymes present in the bacteria, which modify the DNA of the infecting virus e.g., the restriction enzyme, so-called for its ability to restrict the growth of the bacteriophage by cutting the molecule of its DNA to pieces.

You might be interested in
How were skilled workers able to secure new freedoms for themselves in rapidly expanding industries?
LiRa [457]

Their knowledge allowed them to take control of the production process and the training of apprentices.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was there a war between the Viet Minh and France?
Ne4ueva [31]
It happened baecuase the french has stakes in the economy and they also didn't want comunism to spread.
4 0
3 years ago
why are individual rights important to a democratic society in wartime? Why are there some limits on these rights?
ExtremeBDS [4]
There have always been conflicts between individual rights and national security interests in democracies. Limits on civil liberties during wartime, including restrictions on free speech, public assembly, and mass detentions, have been the most serious threats to individual freedom. Even in peacetime, counter-terrorist measures including profiling, detention, and exclusion, along with the use of national identification cards, have raised concerns about racism, constitutional violations, and the loss of privacy. With the passage of new anti-terrorist laws after September 11, 2001, these tensions have increased. Supporters of broader governmental powers insist that they are part of the increased security measures necessary to safeguard national security. In contrast, many civil rights groups fear that the infringement upon individual rights is another step in the erosion of democratic civil society.

Wartime measures. The severest restrictions on civil liberties have occurred in times of war. In September 1862, during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) suspended the right of habeas corpus in order to allow federal authorities to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without arrest warrants or speedy trials. Well aware of the drastic nature of such a step, Lincoln justified it as a necessary wartime measure. After the United States Supreme Court found Lincoln's abrogation of habeas corpus an unconstitutional intrusion on Congressional authority, Congress itself ratified the measure by passing the Habeas Corpus Act in September 1863. Through 1864, about 14,000 people were arrested under the act; about one in seven were detained at length in federal prisons, most on allegations of offering aid to the Confederacy but others on corruption and fraud charges.



Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/In-Int/Intelligence-and-Democracy-Issues-and-Conflicts.html#ixzz4XX37pHRv
4 0
3 years ago
Who opposed slavery in the early years of theUnited States?
insens350 [35]
The south— the north (mostly) opposed slavery, whereas the south (mostly) wanted to keep it around. In fact, slavery was one of the main reasons the American Civil War was fought in the first place.
7 0
3 years ago
The U.S. government has three branches: executive, judicial, and legislative
Anvisha [2.4K]
I would say A because it take majority of the people in order for something to pass
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why might the iranian goverment disagree with this map
    5·1 answer
  • how many people do historians estimate lived within the boundaries of the current United states of America?​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the chinese empress known as the lady of si-ling known for?
    12·1 answer
  • President George H. Bush ultimately saw the invasion of Kuwait as a possible threat against
    11·1 answer
  • What effect did the Great Awakening have on the American colonies?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following actions does NOT fall under the power of judicial review?
    12·2 answers
  • What does the Jewish law requiring use of a yad tell you about the value placed on the Torah by the Hebrews?
    10·1 answer
  • Help pls!……………………………………
    13·1 answer
  • Which “class” did Mao Zedong claim would revolutionize China?
    10·2 answers
  • Help please ASAP THANKSm
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!