1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
labwork [276]
3 years ago
5

If Aristotle and a group of sophists had a debate, who would argue that there is no clear cut right and wrong in speaking, just

the act of persuading others to believe what you believe?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Lorico [155]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Both

Explanation:

Aristotle and Sophist believe that what is considered as 'Right or Wrong' is extremely subjective. Our interpretation of morality tend to be heavily depended on situations, our experience and the things that our social group teach us.

To understand their view, let's examine a situation when a person has to kill a burglar. The act of 'Killing' Generally considered as wrong. But in that particular situation, most people will justify the killing and wouldn't blame the killer.

You might be interested in
Biology help pls giving brainliest
Nezavi [6.7K]
Because the chromosomes need to line up
8 0
4 years ago
Help ...........................
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:hmm prob 1

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What are the causes of problems the Mayas and other Native American groups face in Guatemala? How are people trying to solve the
Allushta [10]
The declaration f independece helped
5 0
3 years ago
A different coffee seller offered to sell coffee to Jenae's company for half the cost of their current brand. Jenae knew her co-
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

The correct approach is "Blind experiment".

Explanation:

  • The Respondents or even just the Committee monitoring the procedure as well as analysis or some variation thereof, called the Blind experiment, retain such knowledge that may impart discrimination into the findings.
  • Due to the lack of understanding among the members of such a community, this would be described as a blind experiment.
8 0
3 years ago
Imagine a civil case is brought to court called Smith v. Henderson. Which statement is correct?
Keith_Richards [23]
The correct answer is <span>B. Smith would be the plaintiff and Henderson will be the defendant. 

Smith would be the plaintiff because that's the name for the person who is initiating the lawsuit in a civil case. Prosecution is when the country does it in a criminal court. Henderson would be the defendant and would have to provide a preponderance of evidence that Smith is incorrect.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What war have the U.S. the southwestern area
    15·1 answer
  • The ________ argument attempts to persuade while stressing understanding and common ground. this method seeks to lessen the thre
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how two machines can appear identical and yet not have the same actual mechanical advantage
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the importance of the god osiris in religon of ancient egypt
    6·1 answer
  • What state is southwest of Michigan. PLEASEEEEEEEEE HURRYYYYYYY!!!!!!​
    14·2 answers
  • Why are juvenile justice laws different each state?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain why most native Americans supported the British during the american revolution
    9·1 answer
  • which classical civilizations most influenced philosophies and democratic ideas of the enlightment period
    12·1 answer
  • What will happens at the end of the world
    11·1 answer
  • Someone pls help hurry i need to get it done an i’m very lost ):
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!