1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Papessa [141]
3 years ago
7

Explain 2 ways you could solve 20=5(-3+x)

Mathematics
1 answer:
Andru [333]3 years ago
5 0
Well you could do x+-3•20=5 theres one way
You might be interested in
Help ASAP Ill mark u brainliest
aniked [119]

Answer:

30% or none of these

Step-by-step explanation:

since least of the girls voted for biking it would be the least percent amount.

Hope this helped and have a wonderful day! <3 :))

5 0
2 years ago
Suppose you want to prove a theorem of the form p → (q ∨ r). Prove that this is equivalent to showing that (p ∧ ¬q) → r.
tino4ka555 [31]

You "distributed" the negation inside the parenthesis. Let's focus on the \lnot (p\wedge \lnot q) part.

We can distribute the negation inside the parenthesis by negating every term, and switching and with or, and vice versa. So, you have

\lnot (p\wedge \lnot q) \equiv (\lnot p) (\lnot \wedge) (\lnot \lnot q)

Of course, writing \lnot \wedge is improper, I was just stressing the fact that we distributed the negation to every term in the parenthesis. So, since a double negation cancels out, you're left with

\lnot (p\wedge \lnot q) \equiv \lnot p \lor q

which of course implies that

\lnot (p\wedge \lnot q) \lor q \equiv (\lnot p \lor q) \lor q

Edit: I actually derived the expression in the opposite order, but since they are equivalent, it doesn't really matters where you start from and where you get to. Anyway, if you actually want to derive \lnot (p \wedge \lnot q) \lor r from (\lnot p \lor q), you simply have to negate the first parenthesis and distribute the negation as discussed.

7 0
3 years ago
The farmer owned 100 acres of land. A year later he bought more property and then owned 140 acres. Is this a percent increase or
Grace [21]

Answer:

The percentage change (an increase) wa 40%.

Step-by-step explanation:

The beginning number of acres was 100; adding 40 more brought that to 140 acres.  This was an increase.  Dividing the increase (40) by the starting value (100) yields 0.40.  Finally, multiplying this result by 100% yields 40%.

The percentage change (an increase) wa 40%.

6 0
3 years ago
The area of a rectangle is 525 sq cm. the ratio of the length to the width is 7:3. find the length and width.
nalin [4]
Suppose the length is 7x, the width is then 3x
7x*3x=525
21x²=525
x²=25
x=5
so the length is 7*5=35, and the width is 3*5=15
3 0
3 years ago
What is the equation of the line perpendicular to 6x-2y=3
andriy [413]

An answer to this would be y=- 1 over 3 x

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Need help an is due tomorrow and please please show your work
    11·1 answer
  • 2n-8&gt;14, graph the solution
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the better buy? 27-cup bottle of bleach for $24.30 or a 2-gallon bottle of bleach for $15.04
    13·2 answers
  • What is 10 +10 -20 add 10 divide by 2 subtract 2 plus 7
    15·2 answers
  • each hour, the number of bacteria in Dr. Nalls petri dish tripled. what percent is the population compared to the population the
    8·1 answer
  • 8 gallons equals how many pints? A. 32 pt. B. 2 pt. C. 128 pt. D. 64 pt.
    6·2 answers
  • I need help on this geometry question on triangles
    8·2 answers
  • 3. What is the volume of the figure?<br>A. 15 cm<br>B. 33 cm<br>C. 45 cm <br>D. 54 cm<br>​
    12·2 answers
  • 2(5x-9) = 11x-3 find m
    7·1 answer
  • Area of a rectangle is 272.4 m if the length is 15 m what is the perimeter of the rectangle
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!