Answer: (this is gonna be a crazy answer)
Explanation: I think it was right to drop the bomb on Japan. The reason for this is because even though many people died, and the fact that most of their land had gotten destroyed, this helped them resolve their problem between the two. If it weren't for the bomb, they would have fought longer. And after that tragedy, this gave Americans and the Japanese to bond and help rebuild japan not only to protect them from other bombs, but to also make sure that no one else can take their land. Therefore, even though it may not have been the best decision, it was right to to drop the bomb on them.
(You don't have to agree with this this is just my opinion but hopefully you get an idea to form your own sentence if you can)
The federal court the state court and the county court
The correct answer is B) Aircraft carriers.
The target that was not present at Pearl Harbor that proved important in the war in the Pacific was aircraft carriers.
The Japanese Air Force could not completely destroy the US fleet. Their bombers missed important targets such as US aircraft carrier that was not on the island at that precise moment. The Japanese also missed oil tanks and ammunition warehouses.
The Japanese were able to surprise the US at Pearl Harbor because Japanese aircraft carriers had approached Hawaii unnoticed.
The Pearl Harbor attack happened on December 7, 1941, during World War II. The United States had maintained its distance from the European conflict due to the policy of neutrality installed by US President Woodrow Wilson. However, after the attack, President Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war and that is how the United States entered World War II.
Answer:
he proceeded to narrate some of the facts in his own history as a slave, and in the course of his speech gave utterance to many noble thoughts and thrilling reflections. As soon as he had taken his seat, filled with hope and admiration, I rose, and declared that PATRICK HENRY, of revolutionary fame, never made a speech more eloquent in the cause of liberty, than the one we had just listened to from the lips of that hunted fugitive. So I believed at that time,--such is my belief now. I reminded the audience of the peril which surrounded this self-emancipated young man at the North, --even in Massachusetts, on the soil of the Pilgrim Fathers, among the descendants of revolutionary sires; and I appealed to them, whether they would ever allow him to be carried back into slavery,--law or no law, constitution or no constitution. The response was unanimous and in thunder-tones--"NO!" "Will you succor and protect him as a brother-man--a resident of the old Bay State?" "YES!" shouted the whole mass, with an energy so startling, that the ruthless tyrants south of Mason and Dixon's line might almost have heard the mighty burst of feeling, and recognized it as the pledge of an invincible determination, on the part of those who gave it, never to betray him that wanders, but to hide the outcast, and firmly to abide the consequences.
Explanation:
