I believe the answer is: precedent
In social setting, we can see a precedent in court ruling.
When a supreme court ruled a controversial case, the other courts would most likely use the ruling as a precedent to settle similar cases that might appear in the future.
Modern foragers are not Stone Age relics, living fossils, lost tribes, or noble savages. Still, to the extent that foraging has been the basis of their subsistence, contemporary and recent hunter-gatherers can illustrate links between foraging economies and other aspects of society and culture, such as their sociopolitical organization.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the history of human beings on this planet, hunters-gatherers hold the longest history. Even today there are many societies where people rely on foraging for their sustenance and survival and have not adapted to the modern ways of civilised societies.
These modern foragers do not stuck in time and living the life of early man but they have developed well organised social and political structure for themselves. They possess their own culture and rituals to follow and their tribe issues are decided by the well-established political system.
Unopposed they would be running against the same party
Im not shur but i think your answer is d corporal punishment and taxes
I believe the answer is: Grief
In psychology, grief refers to the process of coping with the overwhelming emotions that created when we loss someone that we care about.
During this process, most individuals would most likely unable to use the social and cognitve skills normally, which would affect their overall behavior
