Which of the following is true about the civil rights era in the 1950s and 1960s?

History

1 answer:

AnnZ [28]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

a. The Supreme Court became more active in its rulings regarding civil rights

Explanation:

The civil rights movement was a struggle for social justice that took place mainly during the 1950s and 1960s for blacks to gain equal rights under the law in the United States. ... By the mid-20th century, African Americans had had more than enough of prejudice and violence against them.

1956. In January and February, whites angry about the Montgomery Bus Boycott bomb four African American churches and the homes of civil rights leaders King, Ralph Abernathy, and E.D. 13, the Supreme Court upholds an Alabama district court ruling in favor of the Montgomery bus boycotters

You might be interested in

The early support of the Know-Nothings from all regions was helped by their: O A. Refusal to take a stand on slavery. O B. Provi

Ratling [72]

Answer:A

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

I must think of the United States first. And when I think of the United States first in an arrangement like this, I am thinking

ohaa [14]

Answer:

He believed that the US should not become involved in the disputes of other nations.

Explanation:

In the paragraph it says, "you will destroy her powerful good, and endanger her very existence. Leave her to march freely through the centuries to come, as in the years that have gone. Strong, generous, and confident, she has nobly served mankind."

4 0

2 years ago

How did the role of religion differ between feudal Japan and feudal Europe

uysha [10]

<span>That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

In terms of production, what best describes the difference between capitalism and socialism?

Nostrana [21]

The correct answer is: Capitalism is a system in which goods are made by private businesses, but socialism stresses government control over production.

In the capitalist system, the means of production are used to generate profits for owners or shareholders. In addition, there is an emphasis on individual earnings and not on benefiting workers or society as a whole.

On the other hand, in the socialist system, the production is adjusted by the State to meet human needs as well as economic demands. It means that only what is useful and necessary will be produced.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which was more important, the exchange of goods or the exchange of ideas, on the Silk Road? Defend your answer.

Digiron [165]

The change of ideas as it influenced new beliefs and inventions

3 0

2 years ago