1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
omeli [17]
3 years ago
9

A common goal of the Glorious, American, and French revolutions was

History
2 answers:
Georgia [21]3 years ago
8 0
Only that they both deposed an unpopular king. After that they differ....The British 'Glorious' was done without bloodshed or violence, and a new Queen (the deposed Kings daughter) was right away placed on throne as new leader, leading to peace and prosperity. The French...was done with lots of violence, rioting and bloodshed including the execution of the deposed king, the queen and their children. The French never got around to placing a new king or leader on the murdered king's throne, so chaos was the result.
son4ous [18]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Taking into account the three events offered, The Glorious Revolution, The French Revolution and The American Revolution, we can affirm that a common goal was to end the centralization of power and that people can expand their freedoms in the face of an oppressive state.

You might be interested in
What government<br> should provide for<br> the people?
leva [86]
Democracy is the correct answer
3 0
3 years ago
What is the end of the millenia
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Explanation:

A millennia is 1000 years. 1999 December 31 just before midnight, ended the millennia from January 1000 to December 31 just before midnight.

3 0
3 years ago
Definición de feudalismo
Tom [10]

Answer:

El sistema social dominante en la Europa medieval, en el que la nobleza poseía tierras de la corona a cambio del servicio militar, y los vasallos eran a su vez principios de los nobles, mientras que los campesinos estaban obligados a vivir en la tierra de su Señor y rendirle homenaje, trabajo. y una parte del producto, teóricamente a cambio de protección militar.

Explanation:

Espero que esto ayude a marcar el MÁS CEREBRAL !!!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In this unit, you learned that Oklahoma experienced a great deal of change in the late
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."

The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.

5 0
3 years ago
I NEED HELP ASAP!!!
noname [10]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which term refers to a large group of merchant vessels sailing together?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the name of first man made satellite launched into orbit
    10·2 answers
  • Why did South Carolina secede from the Union?
    12·2 answers
  • Types of men came to Jamestown in 1607 '
    7·1 answer
  • What act limited immigration of people from China?
    7·1 answer
  • What started the seven years’ war?
    10·2 answers
  • In which country does the White Nile join the<br> Blue Nile?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the Protestants think of the Catholics
    5·1 answer
  • What was a strategic advantage the South
    7·2 answers
  • What is OPEC?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!