This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
Because some people are just mean, but just think, white people enslaved white people before africans were enslaved at all. In america africans are just known that way but we need to improve.
I think the answer is A, not for sure.
Answer:
Who will consume the goods and services?
How will the goods and services be produced?
What goods and services will be produced?
Explanation:
