Answer:
No, he isn't correct.
Explanation:
The supervisor isn't correct in the given scenario. The safety of all employees of a company matters, regardless of their position.
The organization that protects the workers' safety and health is called OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). If a worker feels like their safety or health are compromised in their workplace, they have the right to file a complaint to OSHA.
Demareas' health is obviously compromised, and he has the right to know what chemicals the cleaner contains. According to the OSHA regulations, workers have the right to know what hazards are present in the workplace so that they can protect themselves.
I believe this would be Position
B sounds the best and most fluent
There are two main ideas for each passage, in the first one it mentions the positive outcomes of having a pet in class; it can help children with health problems and nervousness in students will decrease. In this sentences it supports the idea of a pet in class, saying the positive results of it and how it helps or it will help children.
In the second passage it mentions the negative outcomes of having a pet in class; they will make some health problems worst and the nervousness in students will increase around them. These two ideas are against the possibility of having a pet in class, mentioning how it will affect students instead of helping them.
What makes these two passages different is the opinion towards one main idea: pets in class. One passage supports it and one is against it.
