Answer: The woman took care of the family and the house.
Explanation:
When we talk about women's position in Athenian society, that position was not of significant historical importance. The community in Athens was patriarchal organized. The woman mostly spent time in the house, taking care of the children, and doing housework. That a woman did not have a significant influence in society is also shown by the fact that a woman, even if she was born an Athenian, did not have the right to make political decisions. Even at the time of the birth of Athenian democracy, women did not influence any decision-making, nor did they have the right to vote.
Explanation:
the US government might support the road because they might be able to use the railroads to transport materials for men at war or other materials the country might need.
A lumber producer in New Brunswick might support it because the railroad will require wood for the tracks. The lumber producer can profit from this because the railroad would need a large supply of lumber. They can also use it to transport the lumber.
The figure in history that reminds one of Elie Wiesel is Ruth Ozeki, David Leviathan and Sholom Aleichem.
<h3>What did Elie Wiesel try to teach the world from his own tragedies? </h3>
Elie Wiesel tried to teach the world about the dark side of the Holocaust and why it is important for people to speak the truth against evil.
Elie Wiesel stated that he would never forget the first night in the camp where he was kept. He said the night turned his life into one that was cursed seven times.
Learn more about Elie Wiesel at:
brainly.com/question/5995587
The railroads had a much greater Impact on America than the canals and steamboats, as these allowed you to cross the country much, much quicker. This also allowed food, mainly cattle to be transported, without the flesh rotting. It also had a big Impact on the Native Americans, as this went through a lot of their land.
Hope this helps
Inspired ideals of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness as well as separation of powers. John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu
