1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pantera1 [17]
4 years ago
12

which statement Two data tables are shown. The first table is labeledゥ 2012 FLVSWhich statement is supported by the data in the

tables above?It would be less difficult to pass Republican policy ideas through the Senate between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.It would be less difficult to pass Democratic policy ideas through the Senate between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.It would be more difficult to pass Democratic policy ideas through the House between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.It would be less difficult to pass Republican policy ideas through the House between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.

History
2 answers:
Ann [662]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It would be more difficult to pass Democratic policy ideas through the House between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.


zimovet [89]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The statement that is supported by the data in the tables is It would be less difficult to pass Democratic policy ideas through the Senate between 2008 and 2010, compared to after the 2010 election.

Explanation:

The number of Democrats and Republicans that are reflected in the tables show that between 2008 and 2010 there was a bigger quantity of Democrats in both the composition of the Senate, and the composition of the House of Representatives, then with a majority of Democrats, the Democratic ideas will be more appealing to the majority and easier to pass through.

You might be interested in
In the 1950s, the United States helped South Korea to?
Viktor [21]

Answer:

In June 1950 communist North Korea invaded South Korea. The United States came to the aid of South Korea at the head of a United Nations force composed of more than a dozen countries. Communist China joined North Korea in the war in November 1950, unleashing a massive Chinese ground attack against American forces.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which type of figurative language gives human characteristics to nonhuman forms
Nastasia [14]
personification
...gives nonhuman forms human characteristics!
5 0
4 years ago
What resulted from the growing of large plantations (increased slave population) in British North America during the 1600s and 1
Ksivusya [100]
I think the answer is "<span>The creation of a new distinct, blended African American culture".  African-Americans were brought to the New World because of the booming plantations in the New World. Both the North and South part of Americas thrives on the slave trade in order for the colonies to grow in terms of wealth.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which principal describes Madison’s argument about the federal government
Gemiola [76]

que esineceasroi  ennj diy

4 0
3 years ago
Why did native Americans and French have to deal with each other on equal terms
bulgar [2K]

The main reason is that they did not try to change the Natives. They also did not compete with the Natives for land. When the French first came to the Americas in the 1530s and 1540s to engage in seasonal fur trading, they immediately established strong trading ties with the local Natives they found there. The Natives already dealt extensively in furs.

The French quickly discovered they could go back to France in the winter months with ships laden with furs they had purchased from the Natives with European wares, such as metal cooking pots, weapons, horses, and other goods not accessible to the Natives at that time. The Natives also accompanied the French on hunting parties and showed them where the good fur animals could be found. The French made it a point to learn the Native languages and ways, and established good relations that were based on equality with all of the tribes in the area.

The French began to stay year-round in the early 1600s, establishing their first permanent settlement at Quebec in 1608, one year after the English founded Jamestown in Virginia. They did not displace any Natives in the establishment of their settlement and continued to work closely with them in the fur trade. They respected Native territories, their ways, and treated them as the human beings they were. The Natives, in turn, treated the French as trusted friends. More intermarriages took place between French settlers and Native Americans than with any other European group.

This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the Natives to side with the French in their conflicts with the English settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid-1700s. Relations between the Natives and the English were not nearly as good.

The English treated the Natives as inferior, believed they stood in the way of their God-given right to the land in America and tried to subject the Natives to their laws as they established their colonies. The Spanish didn’t have any better relations with the Natives, as they tried to enslave them when they first came to America, and later established missions where they tried to force them to convert from their traditional religions to Catholicism. The Natives did not appreciate any of this.

The key to the friendly relations the French enjoyed with the Natives was all in the way they treated them when they first encountered them, and how they continued to treat them afterward. As long as the French maintained settlements in America, they enjoyed excellent relations with each other. For those who have early American French ancestry, or French settler ancestors who married Native Americans, the vast majority of those records can be found in the provincial archives of Quebec (some records there might lead back to France if the settler returned there with his Native American bride).

These records provide a fascinating look at relations between Natives and Europeans and show just how different things could have been if all the European people who came to America had been as progressive in their treatment of the Natives as the French were.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Anti-Federalists would limit the Federal government strictly to ________. managing of foreign affairs coining money the powe
    7·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the arguments in Brutus I against a strong executive with those of Hamilton’s argument presented in the Fed
    7·1 answer
  • Which role did Texas play in the program to put a man on the moon?
    14·1 answer
  • What year was anthony r. baeza born?
    6·1 answer
  • Someone help me please
    10·1 answer
  • What is the preamble of the Declaration of Independence?<br><br> Ten points if u answer!!!
    15·2 answers
  • Positive benefits of one party rule in mexico
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement does not accurately describe the Black Death that struck Europe in the fourteenth century?
    5·1 answer
  • Napoleon’s final defeat came at in Belgium against a combined <br> and British army.
    8·1 answer
  • What was the ruling of the Missouri court in the Dred Scott case?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!