Hey there,
The answer is - <span>Sergei Diaghilev.
Hope this helps :))
<em>~Top♥</em>
</span>
Explanation:
The relationship between the French and the Native Americans was way more cordial than the relationship between the British and the Native Americans. The French were interested in establishing trade posts instead of permanent settlements like the British did, so they did not displaced the Native people
Answer:
Thus Marshall incorporated in his definition that economics “examines that part of individual and social action which is most closely connected with attainment and with the use of the material requisites of well-being.” It is the phrase material requisites of well- being that stands for material welfare.
Explanation:
Answer:
If they had met with him four months earlier, they would have encountered a different man. He had run on peace, after all, winning re-election in November 1916 on the slogan “He kept us out of war.” Most Americans had little interest in sending soldiers into the stalemated slaughter that had ravaged the landscapes of Belgium and France since 1914. Wilson, a careful, deliberative former professor, had even tried to convince England and Germany to end World War I through diplomacy throughout 1916. On January 22, speaking before the U.S. Senate, he had proposed a negotiated settlement to the European war, a “peace without victory.”
I think it would be different.
Explanation:
Other escapees or maybe farmers , I’m confused on the context of this question
