I believe the prisoners and guards would have felt awkward on seeing each other in same civilian clothes.
It would be hard for them to handle while walking through the hallway.
<u>Explanation:</u>
At the conclusion of the study, I believe the students would have probably felt awkward on interacting with one another in classes and in public. Definitely the guards may feel ashamed of how they treated the prisoners. On the other hand the prisoners would feel cowed in the presence of those who treated them so poorly. Dr. Zimbardo says that the effect of study won’t last long on the lives of the participants.
Walking through the hallway again will make prisoners to handle it hard as they lived in prison there for some time. Especially when they were in psychology classes, because it was the room where they were isolated from the outside world and verbally abused. I'm sure it will be difficult for the participants to adjust back into their normal behaviors and routines.
(A. <span>Operant conditioning-------------------------</span>
Answer:
Imagine that a scientist has created a new source of power that creates electricity for cars, trucks, factories, and homes is discussed below in details.
Explanation:
In terms of innovation, it is a new beginning of power, so it has creativity or a new idea. In the names of fluency, it is just an individual cause of power, so it does not have many facilities or many distinct ideas. In terms of versatility, it is a reservoir for various things such as automobiles, trucks, warehouses, and homes, so it has adaptability or adjusting ideas to many different circumstances. Finally, in terms of suitability, there is potential now, but we can always change it, so there is some suitability or an approach that solves the problem that was recognized.
The answer is Because many people still struggle with the age old question of what it means to be a good person. Apex.
Answer:
C. State constitutions guaranteed individual liberties.
Explanation:
The 1787 ratification of the Constitution of the United States was one of the major issues of discord between the supporters and opposers of the process. They are known as the Federalists and anti-Federalists.
The main argument of the Anti-federalists was that the federal government will have a massive hold over the people and restrict or minimize individual freedom. They believed that this new Constitution will lead to tyranny and reduce the powers of the state. To them, they wanted the division of power between the national and state governments, for a strong national government will only give more power to the President and individual state powers will lead to oppression. So, their argument was for a state government that will guarantee and allow individual liberties.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
