1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aniked [119]
3 years ago
8

Who eventually "obliterated" Samarkand in the 13th century?​

History
2 answers:
Andrej [43]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:Chinggis Khan

From the 6th to the 13th century it grew into a city more populous than it is today, changing hands every couple of centuries – Western Turks, Arabs, Persian Samanids, Karakhanids, Seljuq Turks, Mongolian Karakitay and Khorezmshah have all ruled here – before being obliterated by Chinggis Khan in 1220.

Explanation:

STatiana [176]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Chinggis Khan

Explanation:

From the 6th to the 13th century it grew into a city more populous than it is today, changing hands every couple of centuries – Western Turks, Arabs, Persian Samanids, Karakhanids, Seljuq Turks, Mongolian Karakitay and Khorezmshah have all ruled here – before being obliterated by Chinggis Khan in 1220.

HOPE THIS HELPS!

GOOD LUCK!

You might be interested in
Which statement best describes the results of the Emancipation Proclamation?
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

Provide statements for best in-depth answer but I'd say anything to do with the freeing of african american slaves.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The segment you just read refers to something called the right of revolution. Why would this have been important to the authors
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The right of revolution was included in the Declaration of Independence because<em> it legitimated the colonists' revolutionary plans against the Britain.</em>

Explanation:

This segment was of great importance as it supported the people in their intention to fight the unjust government.

The government should act in favor of its people's interests, and not repress them and exercise power. By including <em>the right of revolution</em>, the authors of the Declaration obtained for their people the right to disobey and to stand up for themselves.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which region produced most of the cotton during the Civil War? <br><br> A. North<br> B. South
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

South

Explanation:

The Southern region was known for producing cotton while the Northern region was mostly industrial.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what ways did World War I mark the beginning of a new role for the US on the world stage?
irinina [24]

Answer:

One way is that they now helped people and kind of started the Allied Powers

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
In the prince, machiavelli suggests that a ruler should take care that the fear he inspires in his subjects does not turn to hat
coldgirl [10]

Machiavelli ensure that is more beneficial to be feared than loved. As this will not turn the fear into hate and the ruler can also control the state peacefully.

Every prince will want to be considered merciful, but mercy should not be mismanaged. No prince should mind being called cruel for keeping his subjects peaceful and loyal. Punishing a few, and thus averting disorder, is better than allowing troubles to develop that will hurt many. New rulers cannot avoid seeming cruel, because their states are insecure.

You cannot be both loved and feared, then it is better to be feared than loved. Men are generally fickle, afraid of danger, and greedy. A prince must be careful not to make him hated, even though he is feared; to do this, he must keep his hands off his subjects' property and their women. People will sooner forget the death of a father than the loss of an inheritance. However, when a prince commands an army, he must be cruel in order to control his troops. In conclusion, people love at their own wish, but fear at the prince's will, so a wise ruler will rely on what he can best control.

Continuing his discussion of virtues that are not virtues, Machiavelli considers mercy and cruelty. As with generosity and miserliness, he comes down on the side of the supposedly bad quality. He bases his judgment on consideration of what benefits the most people. It is no use to be merciful if by doing so, a prince allows disorder in his state to get out of control. A controlled amount of cruelty, which harms a few, can avert widespread violence and lawlessness, which harms many.

To learn more about Machiavelli here

brainly.com/question/15778425

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why were japanese americans held in internment camps answers?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the role of the prime minister of turkey
    15·1 answer
  • How did news of the water-gate brake-in first reach the public?
    14·1 answer
  • The Crimean War pitted the English, French, and Ottomans against the _____.
    15·1 answer
  • the mughal empire was tolerant of ____, allowing them to live peacefully alongside each other for many years
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was one effect of the Sepoy Rebellion?
    14·1 answer
  • How were the causes of the enlightenment similar to the cause of the industrial revolution? A both movements your responses to t
    13·1 answer
  • Which outcome was an important effect of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution?
    14·1 answer
  • What is true about migration and native dislocation?
    12·1 answer
  • What did abolitions do to stop slavery
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!