Explanation:
1. Peter didn't break that bottle
2. They are not learning English in the room.
3. Something changed my mind.
4. Some one had told me about it.
5. I know her telephone number.
6. My students will not bring the children home.
7. They did not send me a present last week.
8. She didn't give us more information
9 The chief engineer wasn't instructing all the workers of the plan.
10 They can make tea with cold water.
I think that's right !!!
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
There are various facts and figures about Coronavirus. However, for the sale of this question, here are the five factual sentences about coronavirus:
1. The coronavirus, otherwise known as SARS-CoV-2, was discovered on December 31, 2019.
2. Currently, over 968 million vaccine doses have been distributed around the world.
3. Since 2009, when the swine flu (H1N1) pandemic was discovered, CÓVID-19 becomes the first pandemic to be identified since then.
4. Alcóhol-based sanitizers are effective in preventing the spread of CÓVID-19 for everyone.
5. The regular cleaning of hands with sanitizer or soap and water without wearing gloves is considered safe.
Answer:
a. Sentence 3
Explanation:
According to the given paragraph, Zoos are important because they protect animals and help keep them from going extinct.
There is currently ongoing work by the Wildlife Conservation Society to re-release the animals into their habitat.
There are also other programs which are designed to educate the public about the importance of the zoo and also the animals in them.
Therefore, the sentence that is part of the evidence in this paragraph is Sentence 3, because it gave evidence that the National Zoo in Washington D. C. has bred Sumatran tigers, boosting a population that was once only seven hundred in the wild.
<span>An essay type of writing stating the opinions of the publisher is called an Editorial.</span>
Han applies option c- he is challenging the credibility of sources. Ramona ,surprised, asks him if the evidence from Pettit's book was from fictional sources. Hans supports his claim through a review of Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this book which had been written by a story-teller and not by a historian was used by Pettit.
Option a- is wrong. Hans is not determining new research goals. He is questioning the credibility of sources.
Option b-is wrong. Hans is evaluating what an author said about Giovanni Fiorini's book. The material from this 'great' source was used by Pettit in <em>his </em>book.
Option d is wrong. Ramona is asking clarifying questions. She wants Hans to justify his claim. This states that the credibility of sources can be questioned.
