The best answer is C. Usually compared to lion, Andrew Jackson was a very controlling president and was usually compared to a king because of his actions. He vetoed more than the 6 presidents before him combined. A would imply that Jackson let the Native Americans have the land when he did not. B was the opposite of what really happened. C was somewhat close in that the Cherokee did lose the case( not originally but after Jackson repealed it) but they did not ask Jackson for help. He rather forced them out of the land in the Trail of Tears.
One advantage of presidential government is checks and balances.
He did not agree with punishing people for breaking the rules of the church.
Hope this helps!
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with there being very little government oversight and intervention in their business dealings, since this was an era of large economic growth but also a great deal of corruption. </span></span>
