Answer:
D). The authors effectively use verifiable data and a quotation from an expert to support their claim.
Explanation:
The authors are required to provide sufficient evidences while including a claim or argument in a literary work not only to substantiate the claim but also to enhance its credibility and objectivity.
As per the question, option D displays the statement that best assesses the evidence in the text as <u>it reflects that the authors efficiently employ data that are verifiable which leads to validate their claim objectively and the use of a quotation from an expert functions to back(support) their claim and establish the reliability and significance of their point/claim among the readers.</u> Therefore, such evidences would promote a strong and effective conclusion. Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
"Can I have popcorn for a snack?" Sally asked. "May I have popcorn for a snack," Sally's mother corrected her.
Based on the statements presented above, the statement that shows an ineffective claim is choice: <span>The driving age should be raised for three clear reasons. The reason is because the three clear reasons are not being presented and, thus making the statement more of an untruth statement.</span>
Answer:
Because it is calling the boy Intelligent and determined without any facts to backup the statement. Therefore it is just what the author intreprets of the man.
Hope this helps
Plz mark me as Brainliest