Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
#1 farmers piled up debt, over produced food causing prices to fall.
industry produced more than was bought, many items bought on credit
disparity in wealth; few getting wealthy and not spending enough to match the production output
<span>prices declined, people panis and sold stock and took money out of the banks
</span>#2 in beginning, had a hands-off policy
then adopted a volunteerism policy but business and labor did not work together
local and state governments did not have resources to help people on a local level
created RFC to get loans to businesses but funds did not trickle doen to citizens
unemployment and homelessness high
<span>Hoover did not reaction quickly enough and relied too much on local, state, and private efforts to fix the economic problems
</span>
Merry Christmas!
to satisfy want and needs
Carolinas.
Virginia and Chesapeake Bay.
New England.
New York and New Jersey.
Midwest, Mississippi River, and Louisiana.
Florida.
Georgia
the answer is B) natural gas
