Explanation:
Neo-Confucianism included parts of Daoism and Buddhism as well as traditional Confucian ideas. If one wanted a high ranking job, studying Confucian texts was very important. Therefore, many themes from the philosophy, such as filial piety, were used commonly throughout the dynasty.
hi me name is hajheksjsjdjsklasdissjsksdsdjslsojd
John Louis O’Sullivan, a popular editor and columnist, articulated the long-standing American belief in the God-given mission of the United States to lead the world in the transition to democracy. He called this America’s “manifest destiny.” This idea motivated wars of American expansion. He explained this idea in the following essay where he advocated adding Texas to the United States.
Answer:
From my point of view they have five differences:
1- Lifetime lenght, Ottoman Empire ( officially Dawlat-i Aliyye which means just and alone “ Empire / Big State ) has remained more centuries instead of Mughal Empire ( Baburides ).
2- Mughal Empire was just located in one subcontinent/peninsula which is Indian subcontinent but Ottoman Empire located in three different continent; Europe, Asia and Africa.
3- Even all Hindustani languages borrow some words from Turkish - especially Urdu language which Urdu means Army in Turkish - there is no Turkish speaking community after the collapse of Mughal Empire. But in Ottoman Empire case, Turkey’s, Azerbaijan’s and Turkish Republic of North Cyprus’ official language is Turkish and there is many strong and not assimilated linguistic minorities in all Empire’s territory.
4- After the Mughal Empire’s collaps the territory created mainly four states; India, Pakistan, Bengaldesh and Sri Lanka. But on the Ottoman’s territory - after the collapse of course - established 45 different country. So it means that the ethnic and religious diversity of Ottomans were more than Mughals.
5- Even Ottomani Turkish took a strong influence from Arabic and Persian; Turkish was the official language of Ottoman Empire. Instead of this truth, Mughal’s official language was Persian.
I hope my answer helps you to understand.
Wells blames a system in which racist ideology and violence against blacks has become a norm.
She describes in her text that there is an "unwritten law" that whites in particular white women, are in danger when living surrounding by blacks. The lynchings are public and made into a media spectacle. This behavior supports the mob, encourages the mob, and escalates the violence taking place because it literally supported or at the very least no one speaks out against it.
Lynching in America became common following the passage of the Civil War amendments and the end of Reconstruction. To maintain power structure in states where whites were completely outnumbered by blacks, fear and violence ruled. Ida B. Wells was considered a "muckraker", a journalist who exposed the muck or dirt of society. She investigated and exposed the lynching culture of the South. Despite, the support and disgust by many Americans who read her work, no anti-lynching law ever went to effect.