<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The Bill of Rights is the name for the initial ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the intensity of the government and certification subjects of the United States certain rights. These were written in 1789 by James Madison, and depended on essential thoughts regarding individual rights.
The Bill of Rights became effective in 1791, when 3/4 of the states concurred that they were reasonable. Initially, the Bill of Rights had 12 distinct amendments, yet the initial two were not passed by the states. The second change that was not passed was in the long run added to the Constitution in 1992, turning into the 27th amendment in the Constitution.
Federalists contended that the Constitution did not require a bill of rights, on the grounds that the general population and the states held any forces not given to the national government. Enemies of Federalists held that a bill of rights was important to protect individual liberty.
Answer:
The right answer is "American soldiers would have to fight in foreign conflicts."
Explanation:
Isolationists in the U.S. Senate managed to block Wilson´s intentions to join the League of Nations, which was the child of Wilson himself. Their strongest opposition was to Article X of the League´s Covenant. It required all members of the organization to assist any member threatened by external agression. That commitment would force the U.S. to defend another states if they were attacked. The Senate did not pass the necessary legislation for the country to adhere to the League´s Covenant.
Answer:
Boomtown
Explanation:
Boomtown refers to fast-growing communities during the Gold Rush in California
Answer:
The American revolution was inextricably linked with the transformations of the late 18th century, which also took place on the European continent. In time, it almost coincided with the French Revolution, and historically its origin is largely due to the same reasons. Therefore, in the literature these revolutions are often compared. In the question of the origin of the French Revolution, the situational factor is particularly distinguished. The American revolution is interpreted as part of a broad transition period. Both revolutions are interpreted in the context of the theory of clash and change of elites.
First of all, it should be emphasized that the American revolution proceeded under different historical conditions than the French one. While France was a country with a deep historical tradition and centuries-old culture, young America, or rather, the English colonies in America, were relatively recently settled, had not yet had time to acquire traditions and had just begun to create their own culture.
In the American and French revolutions that took place almost at the same time, two essentially opposite concepts prevailed - “checks and balances” and “common will.”.
The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas persistently rethought by the most serious of men in the process of creating a new nation, which was destined to become the freest and most successful community of people in the history of mankind.
The French Revolution was a protest of an angry crowd. It met the desperate resistance of the old classes, and to break it, the merciless dictatorship of the Jacobins was required. The Jacobin dictatorship and the speeches of the plebeian masses were the peak of the revolutionary upsurge in France. The American revolution did not know this kind of phenomenon, and the destruction of the old order did not require such significant efforts.
Explanation: