The correct answer is better C.
Explanation: Frederick Jackson Turner was an American historian, known primarily for his work in the area of US history.
Geographical factors such as topographical characteristics of the environment, climate, and natural resources have a significant impact on culture. Geography influences cultural interactions, what people require for food, clothing, and shelter, as well as how they express themselves.
<h3>How to explain culture?</h3>
The process of facilitating cultural activities, including the arts, toward the realization of a desired future, particularly of a culturally rich and lively community, is known as cultural development.
The expansion of maize had a significant impact on the neighborhood, increasing farmer differentiation and reshaping social networks in favor of influential intermediaries and traders. Their economic environment has changed as a result of the extensive use of credit for consumption or manufacturing and the large price fluctuations in commodities.
Learn more about culture on:
brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ1
Answer:
i think it's 3 bdjdjejdjdjjsjdjsjdjdksksjsjs
Thomas c. durants original occupation was an american financier and railroad promoter.
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...