Answer:
An explosion is a rapid expansion in volume associated with an extremely vigorous outward release of energy, usually with the generation of high temperatures and release of high-pressure gases.
Explanation:
Answer:
Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Explanation:
Voting Rights Act of 1965 was the laws that were enacted by the 36th President of the U. S., President Lyndon B. Johnson.
The law was passed concerning the inequality faced by African-Americans in practicing their voting rights.
After the incident of Selma to Montgomery March, on March 7, 1965, President Johnson brought the law of the Voting Rights Act into the Law on May 26, 1965.
<u>According to this law, African-Americans were given the right to vote regardless they are literate or not. Johnson, through, Voting Rights Act eliminated the racism faced by ethnic minorities</u>.
So, the correct answer is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Answer:
It takes into account people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face.
In other words, the affirmative intersectional theory that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other markers of identity. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (eg, "feminine" and "black") do not exist identified by each other, and each of the information to the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.
Explanation:
Today, intersectionality is considered crucial for social equity work. Activists and community organizations are asking for and participating in more dynamic conversations about differences in experience between people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group can end up perpetuating systems of inequities towards other groups. Intersectionality fully informs YW Boston's work, by encouraging nuanced conversations about inequality in Boston. It illuminates us about health disparities among women of color, provides avenues for our youth leaders to understand identity, and is crucial to the advocacy work we support.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Stare decisis".
Explanation:
- Stare decisis is a constitutional principle or a legal concept that requires courts, when judging on a similar incident, to follow instances.
- This guarantees the same strategy for situations with similar instances and evidence. Put it simply, the courts are bound to follow prior rulings legal precedents.
Therefore, Stare decisis is the right answer.
Drug addiction / abuse reffers to a pattern of continuing substance use despite cognivite, behavioral and physical symptoms.
This can also be called susbtance use disorder. This disorder affects a person's brain and behavior due to the continuos and abusive using of the substance. The constant use makes the person incapable of self-control. It may affect its reasoning and behavior would be the consequences. Physical symptoms would be mostly the cause, in this case.
