The correct answer is retroactive interference
Retroactive interference refers to the phenomenon wherein newly learned and memorized information get in the way of or interferes with recalling and retrieving old memories. In this instance, Alexis's newly formed memory of her current phone number is interfering with her ability to retrieve the memory of her former <span>dorm room's</span> phone number.
Answer:
C. The air at Monterey is COLDER than Virginia Beach. At Monterey, energy is transferred from the air to the ocean. At Virginia Beach, energy is transferred from the ocean to the air.
Explanation:
Answer:
Foreign invaders brought them there as captives.
Explanation:
I just got it right pls leave a thanks
Answer:
E) In the majority of states, the landlord is required to remove the previous tenant or break the agreement with the new tenant.
Explanation:
The landlord will be required to have the previous tenant Eliza who is illegally( we are assuming) occupying the apartment, leave the apartment or he would be breaking the agreement with the new tenant. In some states in the US such as Chicago, the landlord would have to serve a notice to the tenant, and begin formal proceedings after which he may proceed to file a forcible entry or detainer action against the tenant if he remains in the property after expiration of appropriate number of days since notice was served. Eviction proceedings are relatively fast(a few weeks, unless the tenant files a defense) and are handled by local courts He may have to reimburse and settle the new tenant for any damages suffered.
Answer:
Piercing the corporate veil
Explanation:
This are the options that come with this question:
- hiding behind the corporate skirt.
- whistleblowing.
- piercing the corporate veil.
- limited liability.
This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.
