Answer:
Examining the tone and word choice reveals that the author A) opposes the Electoral College.
Explanation:
In the beginning, the author starts by being neutral and not taking a specific side for or against the Electoral College. But after presenting an example of the Electoral College at work, Louis Vincent reveals his hand in paragraph 5. He states that "U.S. citizens are perfectly capable of choosing the person they want for president without interference. It is time to graduate from the Electoral College and let the people decide. You want your vote to matter, don't you?", this shows that he is against the Electoral College and wants the votes of U.S. citizens to directly be able to impact the voting or leaders. So the correct option is A), the author opposes the Electoral College.
Verna von Pfetten believes in the article “Read This Story Without Distraction (Can You?),” that monotasking has its advantages although the environment has more to do with concentrating than one might think. Everyone knows “multitasking” doesn’t really exist. The brain cannot multitask. Instead, it changes from one task to another, meeting the demands of only one at a time. There is a cost associated with this switch, resulting in brain power being eaten away driving productivity to slip.
<h3>What are the multitasking talents?</h3>
- Managing several social media reports.
- Attending to music while exercising.
- Cooking dinner while speaking on the phone.
- Having a conversation while driving.
- Scheduling multiple orders at once.
- Replying phone calls and emails simultaneously.
- Prioritizing emails to reply to in a customer service setting.
To learn more about Verna von Pfetten, refer
brainly.com/question/21312419
#SPJ9
Hard question! Hope you get an answer.