1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alinara [238K]
3 years ago
14

What economic impact did the latin american wars for independence have on the region

History
2 answers:
beks73 [17]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is D) the destruction of infrastructure and the loss of skilled labor caused economic decline throughout the region.

The economic impact that the Latin American wars for independence had on the region was "the destruction of infrastructure and the loss of skilled labor caused economic decline throughout the region."

Most of the wars of independence in Latin American left sequels and conditions that were difficult to overcome. After so many destruction and deaths, Latin American countries that finally got their independence suffered severe damage to basic infrastructure and the loss of lives, that impede them to build the nation in an ideal way. The economy of the country suffered and the social condition followed.

Dmitry [639]3 years ago
6 0
The hands of the Iberian powers who had ruled the region since conquest
You might be interested in
Write the Declaration of Independence in your own words
ioda

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. I can't put the whole thing i have to keep it under 5000 charaters.

7 0
3 years ago
Who helped the Pilgrims learn about fertilizer
fredd [130]
It was a Native American called Tisquantum, also known as Squanto.


Squanto was a native American who could speak English. He had been captured a slave as a young boy and taken to Spain. From Spain he was sent to England and from where he managed to move back to his home region in modern-day Massachusetts.

On arriving back, he found out that his tribe has been effectively wiped off.

His English skills came in handy and he become close to the Pilgrims in the area. He taught them how to use the local soil to grow crops and essential food.

Historians believe that if it wasn't for Squanto, the Pilgrims would have perished within a few months.



5 0
2 years ago
Lord Anthony Ashley Cooper helped establish Charles Town by
lana66690 [7]
As far as I know, Lord Anthony wasn't heavily involved with the origins of Charles Town but was one of the 8 Lord Proprietors and considered the most versatile. He did take a lost of care and interest in the colony however, and had his friend John Locke write up a Constitution for it, but historians debate now that the Constitution was mainly written by Lord Anthony himself.
I'm not sure if this was originally multiple choice, but maybe this will narrow some of the options down if so!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Manifest Destiny encourage westward expansion?
zavuch27 [327]

Manifest Destiny was a term that described the widespread belief in the mid-19th century that the United States had a special mission to extend west.

Explanation:

  • The concept was not particularly new, as Americans were already exploring and settling west, first across the Appalachian Mountains in the late 1700s and then, beyond the Mississippi River in the early 1790s.
  • But by presenting the concept of Western expansion as one's religious mission, the idea of manifest destiny struck a chord.
  • Although the phrase manifest destiny seems to have taken on a public mood in the mid-19th century, it has not been observed with universal approval.
  • Some at the time thought that they were simply putting pseudo-religious fields on a radiant craving and conquest.

Learn more on Manifest Destiny on

brainly.com/question/873877

brainly.com/question/7668829

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Shi’a is a division of Islam who
nevsk [136]

Answer:

Like other Muslims, the Shi´ites believe in the unity of God (Allah is the only God) and His divine guidance through God´s Messenger , the Prophet Muhammad. But they maintain that for the moral and spiritual leadership of the ummah (community of believers), Allah instructed the Prophet to appoint Imam Ali, a figure of authority (actually he was Muhammad´s cousin and son-in-law), to succeed him as leader of all Muslims. This tenet is not accepted by Sunni Muslims, the majority in Islam. Shi´ia is predominant in Iran and Iraq.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Before the northern part of the Rocky Mountain Region was part of Canada, the territory was controlled by who
    15·1 answer
  • Which was the following was a pull factor that caused the Dutch to explore the indies
    15·1 answer
  • Which area was colonized under new imperialism?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following was true about Shang government? a. The king was viewed as an intermediary between heaven and earth. b. T
    8·1 answer
  • What was the goal of the congress of Vienna
    15·1 answer
  • Place the events of World War II in the correct order.
    9·2 answers
  • What was the main reason the Persians went to war with greece
    7·1 answer
  • Can you help me with history?
    10·1 answer
  • List the five types of law
    12·1 answer
  • What resulted from negotiations after the American Revolution?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!