1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesnalui [34]
3 years ago
15

How did the colonists respond to the unfair British system of mercantilism?

History
1 answer:
kvasek [131]3 years ago
6 0

Broadly speaking, Mercantilism was very good for European countries for a while but terrible for their colonies.

Mercantilism made people in the Old World VERY rich and this made the Colonists angry.

As a result, the colonists started to push back and eventually rebelled.

You might be interested in
The governor of Mexican California
Afina-wow [57]
Pio de Jesus<span> was the last governor of Mexican California.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is an example of a domestic policy?
SOVA2 [1]
The only example of a domestic policy from the list would be "<span>a law passed that funds military programs," since domestic policies have to do with issues pertaining to the country in question, not the relationship of the country with other nations. </span>
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give a brief explanation of how the Stamp Act, Sugar Act, and the Intolerable Acts
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

Before the civil war that engulfed England in the 1640s, life in the American colonies was regulated by orders occasionally received from the mother country. After the restoration of the Stuart power in 1660, control over trade with the colonies was further strengthened. A Navigation Act restricted the delivery of certain goods, in particular tobacco and sugar, to British ports. New navigational laws, and especially the Sugar Act, hurt the lucrative trade for the West Indies for American merchants. Doubled duties on the import of industrial products from England led to an unprecedented high cost.

The Stamp Act, passed in 1765 by the British Parliament, triggered the first massive outbreak of violence. The law, requiring tax on all legal documents, newspapers and other printed materials, has not entered into force. The riots, initiated by merchants and lawyers under the auspices of the secret society Sons of Liberty, forced to withdraw tax collectors.

In the colonies, the threads of the conspiracy spread. New legislation was seen as part of a carefully planned and far-reaching strategy of imperial domination. New laws and officials encroached on American traditional freedoms; regular army units were thrown against them, five people were killed in clashes in Boston; jury trials were abolished, and taxes were imposed for the third time without the consent of the colonists. All these events taken together could mean only one thing: the king and his ministers intended to establish a system of absolutism in America.

Revolutionary sentiments were especially strong in New England. In December 1773, several colonists disguised as Indians made their way to merchant ships and dropped 342 chests of tea into Boston Bay. In response, Lord North secured the consent of the angry parliament to take tough repressive measures. British lawmakers regretted their conciliatory decision to repeal the Stamp Act and Townshend Duty. In accordance with repressive laws, which the colonists dubbed “intolerable,” the port of Boston was closed reimbursement of damages for tea destroyed, and the powers of self-government in Massachusetts were cut off. But such a harsh reaction from the English parliament rallied the colonists even more closely.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How was the Netherlands more democratic than most seventeenth-century European nations
KiRa [710]

The Netherlands is more democratic than most seventeenth-century European nations in certain ways. These are:

  • The country operates a confederacy which gives each state or province a huge level of freedom.
  • During this period anybody can win the position of the province leader.
  • This position is known as a stadtholder.
  • Unlike other European nations at this period that are operating monarchical style of government.
  • Also, the Netherlands, at this point was using a republic form of government.

Hence, in this case, the Netherlands was more democratic than most seventeenth-century European nations.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/12205775

4 0
3 years ago
Who knows me like a saucy boy​
victus00 [196]

Answer:

me and you are just too fresh

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • True or false:
    7·1 answer
  • Why did railroads have a greater impact on American society than did canals and steamboats?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the writers of the Constitution create a way to allow amendments?
    10·2 answers
  • Which group became the main residents of the inner city during the Gilded Age?
    9·2 answers
  • The Great Compromise of the Constitution resulted in the
    11·2 answers
  • What four commanders and their troops met at Yorktown
    9·1 answer
  • What was unique about the Ottoman Janissary soldiers?
    13·1 answer
  • An article 26–2 of the United Nations Universal declaration what subjects and books address the goal?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the objective of the Monroe Doctrine?
    11·1 answer
  • Write an essay comparing and contrasting the early civilizations that developed in Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Indus Valley, and Chi
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!