Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
The conflict is the character is not happy and feels like not many people are happy and can stay happy where they are. The character is sad about the conflict.
Answer: С
. It cut down the travel time of cargo ships moving between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
Explanation:
Before the Panama canal was built, ships in the western hemisphere trying to get to the Pacific ocean either had to go around Argentina or South Africa, the latter of which would see them having to go through the Indian Ocean first.
The Panama canal changed all that by cutting a path across Panama in central America to the Pacific. This allowed for ships to be able to get to the Pacific faster and vice versa thereby cutting down the travel time for cargo ships moving between both oceans.
Ways to connect all ideas across all disciplines.
The speaker condemns the Divine Power, in the form of the Lord or Thy God. It is with great sorrow and sadness that the poem was written. This is because the plot seems to be focused on war and defeat that was happening during that time period. The author wanted to emphasize the role of the Divine Power in mediating his roles over His people.
