Its answer b
----------------
Answer:
The act was designed to limit the power of monopolies and trusts.
The act did not lead to many successful government prosecutions.
The fact that the act did not define the terms “monopoly” and “trust” limit the act.
Support from the federal courts would have made the act more effective.
Explanation:
Answer:PAINE’S ARGUMENTS IN COMMON SENSE (2)
1
- The monarchy was
depriving the people
of their rights.
- Britain is free because
of the people
- The constitution in
Britain doesn’t have enough freedom between classes
2
- Kings family rules
supreme but they don’t have the right to rule.
- Dividing people into social classes isn’t the natural order and doesn’t lead to prosperity
- Kings got power through bad ways
3
- The monarchy and
succession would lead
to destruction
- Questioning the power
of the king.
- America doesn’t need
Britain.
4
- Britain is the only thing
uniting colonies
- Not all colonists are
English
- People who supported
Britain couldn’t be trusted/had poor judgement
5
- There is no possibility
of reconciliation with
Britain
- Nonviolent British rule
is ineffective
- Colonies can’t make
progress if they remain tied to Britain
Explanation:I saw this in a document on the web
