Mostly as an inferior race. The British empire was especially "good" at this, mostly their armies who refused to believe that natives can put up a hell of a fight (Shaka Zulu and countless others proved them wrong). British had almost no appreciation for native cultures and exploited them, for example in India they used natives regardless of their caste system. That did not work well.
<span>But the most outrageous exploitation was governed by Spanish empire. They discovered a moutain full of silver in Incan empire and they forced every native to work in mines for a given amount of time. But for refining silver they needed mercury, and they got it from other mines. Guess who had to work there? Guessed right. Mining silver is very dangerous because of poisonous dust and fumes. The conditions were so bad that some natives even resorted to maiming their children in order to spare them from it.</span>
The Sons' Of Liberty leader was Samuel Adams.
The first standing Committee of Correspondence was formed by Samuel Adams.
George Washington served as one of the commanders in the Virginia militia during the French and Indian war.
George Washington appointed commander of the Continental Army.
Hope this helps!
<h3>Invasions by Barbarian tribes</h3>
The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.
Oliver Cromwell<span>'s </span><span>New Model Army or just New Model Army, is the answer.
Hope this helps. :)</span>