1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alisiya [41]
3 years ago
11

1.) Should officers with body-worn cameras be required to announce they are wearing the devices?

Law
1 answer:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

1. No they don't have to announce it if it's obvious to the people or no an officer don't need to announce it

And

2. The body-worn camera should be worn when there's an important issue going on to preserve an evidence and a clue of what really happened and for more reality and caution ⚠

You might be interested in
10 points
Nataliya [291]

Answer:

- recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is living on credit both dangerous to you personally and dangerous to the country?​
worty [1.4K]
Honestly it’s not dangerous to live on credit unless you DON’T PAY YOUR BILLS because with cash you have a higher chance of your money being lost or stolen, and with debit you can only pay exactly what you have in your account penny for penny, but with credit you can over spend a little on Thursday if your pay check comes tomorrow.

Please mark brainliest
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the career options with their associated responsibilities.
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

oh i get it done even know what it is not a good idea to get it done even

Explanation:

ight lets see how it goes I am not in this i am not in this i am not

5 0
3 years ago
Is the media mostly fair?<br> Back up with your opinion and facts
Liula [17]

Answer: Yes most media is fair like USA Today, GMA, CNN are fair but Fox is not fair and spreads Proganda. You can back this up by analyzing their reporting in contrast to the truth.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on free speech under some circumstances, but overturned restrictions
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Perhaps to avoid people getting emotionally hurt?

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What would you do if you see someone robbing a house​
    9·2 answers
  • DUE TONIGHT How could the remapping of Texas be applied to example and explain the state's Don't Mess With Texas, age old attitu
    13·1 answer
  • Help please. make a creative piece of work on the equality act. Will give brainliest
    15·1 answer
  • This was a law created in 1887 to regulate railroads to ensure fair rates
    6·1 answer
  • What is not a safe skill you can employ to prevent your fellow teen passengers from distracting you while driving,answer option
    14·2 answers
  • This article of the constitution deals with the executive branch
    10·1 answer
  • Maintaining the security of crime scene photographs is vitally important. Every time photographs change possession, the name of
    10·1 answer
  • How are congressional districts determined
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement regarding case law is true?
    8·1 answer
  • The current copyright law allows an author to put their work into the public domain if they so choose and not profit from it
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!