1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blondinia [14]
3 years ago
8

Interpreting Political Cartoons 1. Describe what is happening in the cartoon. 2. Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany.

Does that fact explain why the cartoon blames Hitler personally for the treatment of German minorities? Explain. 3. Why might a minority group in the situation shown by the cartoon go along with a dicta- tor's demand? 4. Drawing Conclusions Why do you think Hitler wanted German minorities to tell the world they were doing well?​
Law
1 answer:
Alborosie3 years ago
5 0

Incomplete question. Attached is the missing image.

<u>Explanation:</u>

1. The shows a <u>weak</u> prisoner forced to make a statement against his will, he is been forced to say what the man (representing the dictator, Hitler) behind him tells him to say.

2. Many people conclude that the fact Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany makes him personally responsible for the way in which German minorities were treated.

3. Because failing to do so as is often the case would result in their own death, just as the cartoon shows a gun pointed at the head of the prisoner.

4. So he appears to be their messiah or savior.

You might be interested in
Which component increase in the increase term insurance
Allushta [10]

Answer: Death benefits increase.

3 0
3 years ago
Chris’s friends have dared him to remove a stop sign from a neighborhood. That evening, Chris walks through his ex-girlfriend’s
Romashka [77]

Its House Arrest because my friend did the same thing and thats what he got

4 0
4 years ago
Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

As used in these standards, “prosecutor” means any attorney, regardless of agency, title, or full or part-time assignment, who acts as an attorney to investigate or prosecute criminal cases or who provides legal advice regarding a criminal matter to government lawyers, agents, or offices participating in the investigation or prosecution of criminal cases. These Standards are intended to apply in any context in which a lawyer would reasonably understand that a criminal prosecution could result.

These Standards are intended to provide guidance for the professional conduct and performance of prosecutors. They are written and intended to be entirely consistent with the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and are not intended to modify a prosecutor's obligations under applicable rules, statutes, or the constitution. They are aspirational or describe “best practices,” and are not intended to serve as the basis for the imposition of professional discipline, to create substantive or procedural rights for accused or convicted persons, to create a standard of care for civil liability, or to serve as a predicate for a motion to suppress evidence or dismiss a charge. For purposes of consistency, these Standards sometimes include language taken from the Model Rules of Professional Conduct; but the Standards often address conduct or provide details beyond that governed by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. No inconsistency is ever intended; and in any case a lawyer should always read and comply with the rules of professional conduct and other authorities that are binding in the specific jurisdiction or matter, including choice of law principles that may regulate the lawyer’s ethical conduct.

Because the Standards for Criminal Justice are aspirational, the words “should” or “should not” are used in these Standards, rather than mandatory phrases such as “shall” or “shall not,” to describe the conduct of lawyers that is expected or recommended under these Standards. The Standards are not intended to suggest any lesser standard of conduct than may be required by applicable mandatory rules, statutes, or other binding authorities.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/ for more info

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Deducciones autorizadas por la ley
Vadim26 [7]
Esas tienes que buscarlas en línea para estar más segura obvisss
4 0
3 years ago
Who decides how many justices serve on the Supreme Court?
Agata [3.3K]
I believe it is left to Congress to decide
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children.
    12·1 answer
  • Which is not a crime deterrence?
    14·1 answer
  • How are all courts, except the US Supreme Court, established? A. by the Constitution B. by Congress C. by presidential executive
    8·2 answers
  • What type of evidence is usually found at crime scenes on television shows but not always found at real crime scenes?
    7·1 answer
  • In Abel v. Baker, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in th
    11·1 answer
  • What court hears challenged from lower court
    10·1 answer
  • Give two suggestions for each of the following cases:
    13·1 answer
  • What is the extremely hot layer that is made almost entirely of solid iron?
    5·2 answers
  • An employer can be vicariously liable for the actions of an employee. Explain what this means. Also explain, in general terms, t
    11·1 answer
  • Introduction, acceptance, buy, arrest, covering of the informant, and after action are common steps of
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!