Answer: b. Quality problem occurs
• c. It tends to decrease with the growing degree of division of labor
Explanation:
From the scenario on the question, the most likely thing to result is for quality problems to occur. Quality simply has to do with the extent to which a particular product satisfies already specified requirements.
Based on the scenarios such as the worker at the bottleneck station being replaced by another worker who works more slowly than the original worker, the quality will be affected.
Division of labor is when task are being delegated in a workplace so that efficiency can be improved. When there is a rise in the division of labor, learning is affected as there'll be a decrease as division of labor increases. This is because everyone has his or her role to play rather than learning more about other departments or roles, the worker will be typically focused on one role.
"when a profit-maximizing firm in a competitive market has zero economic profit, accounting profit"
The answer is positive.
Answer:
He can deduct on his 2019 federal income tax return for state income tax $1,550
Explanation:
According to the given data, we can conclude that Carlos cannot deduct the addition of $600 of state income until next year.
Therefore, in order to calculate how much state income tax can Carlos deduct on his 2019 federal income tax return for state income tax we would need to make the following calculation
income tax to deduct on 2019 federal income tax return= Taxes paid+ withheld state income tax from salary
income tax to deduct on 2019 federal income tax return= $800 + $750 income tax to deduct on 2019 federal income tax return=$1,550.
It is company policy to get "slotting allowance" in order to secure shelf space for new brands.
Slotting allowance or fee is the expense charged to makers/producers by the market retailers for different reasons like keeping their items, stocking the item in its stockroom, or stock and IT support. The slotting allowance may likewise be charged on the marketing expenditure brought about by the organization for the item.
<span>Because the statute penalizes the person committing the crime as well as the employer whose employee committed the crime, Chris can be held liable, and the company that we works for (Watkins) can be held vicariously liable under the statute.</span>
