Answer:$27.78
Explanation:
Expected value of debt after one year = (40* .60)+(15*.40)
= 24 + 6
=$ 30
Current value of debt = Value at 1year / (1+r)^n
= 30/ (1+.08)^1
= 30 / 1.08
=$ 27.78
Hello!
Think of a machine. You put something in. This is the input. The conversion process is whatever goes on inside the machine. Let's say that the machine will spray paint a vase you put into it. The vase is the input. The spray painting is the conversion process. What comes out of the machine, or the result, is the output. In our example it would be the painted vase.
The conversion process changes the input into the output.
For example, think of a function, or a table. Let's say that we have the rule, +1. Let's say our input is 1. The conversion process is +1. This makes 1 become the output of two.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
d. $33,641.50
Explanation:
In this question, we use the PMT formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $375,000
Future value = $0
Rate of interest = 7.5%
NPER = 25 years
The formula is shown below:
= -PMT(Rate;NPER;PV;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the answer would be $33,641.50
Answer:
quantity demanded; quantity supplied; supply; demand
Explanation:
When there is a change in price of goods, this change will lead to quantity demanded and it will also lead to a change in the quantity supplied. According to the law of demand, an increase in price will lead to a decrease in quantity demanded and vice-versa.
When there is a change in government susidies, this change will lead to a change in supply, and a change in the number of buyers will lead to a change in demand.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
A change in price will lead to a change in quantity demanded and to a change in <em>quantity supplied,</em> while a change in government subsidies will lead to a change in supply and a change in the number of buyers will lead to a change in demand.
In this question the options are missing; here are the options:
Which best describes how Greg could find more information about the website to check for its validation?
Greg could assume it is valid because it is a .net.
Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.
Greg could look to see if the website was updated recently,
Greg could assume it is valid since Frank is not selling anything.
The answer to this question is B. Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.
Explanation:
One of the key factors that make a source to be credible is the expertise of the author because if the author is an expert in the area, the source is generally considered as credible. For example, the words of Isaac Newton are a credible source if these are related to areas such as maths, physics, or astronomy because he was an expert in this area. In this context, one way Greg could validate this source is by checking who is Frank Smith to verify if he is an expert in the topic. This makes option B correct.
