The civil rights leaders of the 1960s had different views and some of them were:
Martin Luther:
- Content of a person's character.
- End of segregation.
- Nonviolent forms of protest.
Malcom X:
- Equality by any means necessary.
- Black nationalism.
- Practice of Islam.
<h3>What did the Civil Rights Leaders believe in?</h3>
While Dr. King believed in an end to segregation and non violence, Malcom X believed that Blacks should get their own nation or independence by any means necessary.
Malcom X also believed in the practice of Islam while Dr. Kin was Christian and looked at a person's character.
Find out more on Malcom X at brainly.com/question/832691.
John Locke (1632—1704) John Locke was among the most famous philosophers and political theorists of the 17th century. He is often regarded as the founder of a school of thought known as British Empiricism, and he made foundational contributions to modern theories of limited, liberal government. John Locke FRS was an English philosopher and physician, widely regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers and commonly known as the "Father of Liberalism". ... 3 Religious beliefs. 3.1 Philosophy From .... of Church and State. He had a strong influence on Voltaire who called him "le sage Locke John Locke FRS was an English philosopher and physician, widely regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers and commonly known as the "Father of Liberalism".
Answer:
German Empire. In total at least 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war. In World War I the Indian Army fought against the German Empire in German East Africa and on the Western Front. At the First Battle of Ypres, Khudadad Khan became the first Indian to be awarded a Victoria Cross.
Maybe brainliest please?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no incluyes opciones o incisos para contestar la pregunta, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
La relación qué hace Aristóteles entre el concepto de Estado, la idea de bien y el concepto de Asociación, es que estos tres conceptos están íntimamente relacionados entre sí por el hecho de que es el Estado la institución gubernamental más importante de quien depende el orden y la armonía en la sociedad, y que al estar al frente de la sociedad, debe procurar el bien común para esos integrantes de la sociedad.
Aristóteles reconoce que el ser humano es un individuo sociable y que debe aprender a vivir y convivir en sociedad. Vamos, es sociable por naturaleza. Y dentro de esta capacidad, el hombre busca asociarse con otras personas afines en ciertos sentidos, gustos, tareas o costumbres.
Aristóteles se refiere ala idea de que el "hombre es una creatura política" que necesitan asociarse desde el seno familiar y luego, en la estructura social, como parte de su desarrollo y participación en los diferentes ámbitos sociales y de gobierno.
Answer:
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace. Over the next few years, segregation and Black disenfranchisement picked up pace in the South, and was more than tolerated by the North. Congress defeated a bill that would have given federal protection to elections in 1892, and nullified a number of Reconstruction laws on the books.
Then, on May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Plessy v. Ferguson. In declaring separate-but-equal facilities constitutional on intrastate railroads, the Court ruled that the protections of 14th Amendment applied only to political and civil rights (like voting and jury service), not “social rights” (sitting in the railroad car of your choice).
In its ruling, the Court denied that segregated railroad cars for Black people were necessarily inferior. “We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy’s] argument,” Justice Henry Brown wrote, “to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it.”
