The answer is FALSE;
an operator is only trained to operate a narrow aisle lift truck which is
indicated on the permit of OSHA that has very clear standards that employees
must follow. If an operator is in need to operate a lifting device with a larger
capacity or a different kind of a lifting device, an operator will need
conversion training with the class of lifting truck. <span>It is not allowed
to operate any lifting truck without proper training, authorized and employer certified
on the specific class of lift truck. Once an operator is certified, he is
responsible for the following safety procedures outlined in the training, truck
manufacturers owner, operator’s manual, and company’s policies and procedures. The
employer is intended to certify that each operator has been qualified and assessed
as compulsory. Preceding to the employer verifying the operator: the operator
must obtain classroom type training, hands on training and an assessment. </span>
Answer:
a. 1.14
Explanation:
The current ratio is a financial measure that shows how many times the current assets of an entity may be used (covers) the current obligations (liabilities) of the entity.
It is given as current assets divided by current liabilities.
Astin Company’s current ratio
= $82530/$72120
= 1.14
This means that the current assets will settle the current liabilities 1.14 times.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because there are plenty of suppliers for some goods, the food truck owner is more powerful in this case than the suppliers. Here the power of suppliers is low
For the other goods with only a single supplier. the supplier has more powerful than the taco seller. here the power of supplier is high. If the supplier increases price, the taco seller would most likely have an inelastic demand and would be at the mercy of the supplier
thus, the power of suppliers is relatively high for some items and relatively low for others.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
This is not unethical because it is a common and acceptable practice among many reputable public companies in the United States to adjust their account statements according to their objectives.
Remember, every organisation had a right to decide It's accounting methods.
In this scenario, what both parties hope to achieve is to build up confidence from potential investors.
Answer:
$118,000
Explanation:
We know the purchase price of land = $100,000
Also any kind of brokerage or commission is added to such cost as it is part of acquisition and one time expense, thus capital in nature.
Thus, $8,000 paid as brokerage will be added.
Also the one time expense in the capital nature being the demolishing expense will be added to cost.
Thus, net cost of land = $100,000 + $8,000 + $10,000 = $118,000
Some of the salvage sold results in an income for the company, and that shall form part of income statement, and has nothing to do with cost of land.
Thus, net historical cost = $118,000
