1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Musya8 [376]
4 years ago
8

Compare the 2008 and 2012 turnouts by ethnicity. Next analyze what the comparisons of 2008 and 2012 mean in terms of the politic

al parties. Write a 250-word essay comparing the elections in terms of voter turnout among different voting groups—namely, African Americans, Hispanics, and young people. Explain in your own words how changes (if any) in the voting styles of these groups affected the elections.
HELP PLS!
History
1 answer:
JulijaS [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I found this on the web. I hope it helps you

The demographics of the likely voter sample give an estimate of the relative influence each subgroup will have on the overall vote due to its voter turnout. The figures in the accompanying graph are derived from Gallup survey estimates, which are different from and may not match figures from exit poll surveys that use different methods and different questions to measure these demographic variables.

Gallup identifies likely voters using a series of seven questions that ask about current voting intentions and past voting behavior. The resulting sample of likely voters has proven to give a generally accurate prediction of the final election outcome. For example, in 2004, Gallup's final likely voter estimate (before undecideds were allocated to the candidates) showed George W. Bush with a two-percentage-point advantage over John Kerry in an election Bush won by just over two points. And Gallup's final 2008 estimate showed Barack Obama outpolling John McCain by 11 points, a slight overestimate of Obama's seven-point margin of victory.

The lack of change in the composition of the electorate in recent years is not unexpected, given that there are limits on how great a share of the electorate a subgroup can represent -- mainly its share of the overall U.S. adult population. For example, if 12% of all Americans are black, turnout among blacks would have to be proportionately greater than that of other racial groups for their share of the electorate to exceed 12%. The fact that 11% of likely voters this year are black indicates that turnout among blacks may be slightly less than among other racial groups.

To the extent the electorate looks different now compared with 2004 or 2008, those changes may have as much to do with changes in the larger national adult population as with differential turnout by group this year.

For example, the largest changes in the composition of the electorate compared with the last presidential election concern the partisan affiliation of voters. Currently, 46% of likely voters identify as Democrats or lean Democratic, compared with 54% in 2008. But in 2008, Democrats enjoyed a wide 12-point advantage in party affiliation among national adults, the largest Gallup had seen in at least two decades. More recently, Americans have been about as likely to identify as or lean Republican as to identify as or lean Democratic. Consequently, the electorate has also become less Democratic and more Republican in its political orientation than in 2008. In fact, the party composition of the electorate this year looks more similar to the electorate in 2004 than 2008.

Additionally, the percentage of nonwhite voters, now 20%, has risen significantly since 2004 (15%) -- though it is similar to 2008's 19% -- largely due to the proportionately greater growth of the nonwhite population in the United States over the past decade.

Implications

Thus, given the relatively similar demographic composition of the 2012 and 2008 electorates, the election's outcome may hinge more on how groups vote rather than to what extent they will vote. And most groups are currently less likely to support Obama now than they were in 2008. However, Obama's seven-point margin of victory in the 2008 election leaves him considerable breathing room to lose electoral support yet still win the election.

At this point, though, Gallup Daily tracking of likely voter preferences suggests Obama has lost more support than he could afford to, given his current 50% to 47% deficit to his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney. To close that gap in the final weeks of the campaign, Obama would need to have subgroups favorable to him, such as blacks or young adults, turn out at rates that match or exceed those of groups less favorable to him, or to increase his support among key subgroups even if their turnout remains the same.

Track every angle of the presidential race on Gallup.com's Election 2012 page.

Sign up to get Election 2012 news stories from Gallup as soon as they are published.

Also i have over 1000 points but I still need 8 brainliest to get to the expert rank, so if you would be so kind to give me brainliest then thank you

You might be interested in
How did Friedrich Engels try to correct the ills of industrialization?
NeX [460]
Communist state: the end of capitalist exploitation of the workers by the middle classes, the end of nationalism - as all workers share a similar culture and <span>nationalism is a capitalist construct and the end of exploitation by the ruling class</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Biodiversity refers to a wide range of which of the following species?
Vaselesa [24]
D all of the above because anything in an ecosystem adds to the biodiversity of it.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the roots and original party platforms of todays present Democratic and Republican political parties.
Naddik [55]
The Democratic Party, although it had existed from the time of the framing as the Democratic-Republican party, headed more or less by Thomas Jefferson, was reformulated by Andrew Jackson in the 1820s, and its core principles were a deep distrust of cultural or fiscal aristocracy, central government, fiat money and large banks. It was strongly populist, strongly in favor of exploitation of the Western frontier and natural resources generally, and generally strongly racist, with an abiding contempt for Native Americans, foreign immigrants, and blacks. The Republican Party was founded from the ashes of the Whigs in the 1850s, and its first important leader was Abraham Lincoln, elected President in 1860s. Its core principles were a "frontiersman" self-reliance, ecological conservationism, support for small business, a neutrality towards large business and government, and a strong support for the civil rights of immigrants, Native Americans, and blacks. Of course, over time each party has evolved considerably.

4 0
3 years ago
3 Although it was canceled, the 1941 March on Washington was still successful.
Kipish [7]
A- Roosevelt issued executive order 8802, for bidding discrimination by any defense contractors & establishing the FEPC to investigate charges of racial discrimination
8 0
3 years ago
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME WITH THIS PLZ?
viktelen [127]
Yeah look at the third sentence
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who set up a center for exploration in the 1400s?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Magna Carta a significant document in the history of democracy?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the causes of the world war II ?
    7·2 answers
  • how did technological advances contribute to the growth and development of human societies during the bronze age?
    5·1 answer
  • What is 2-1 and who is the president of spain
    6·1 answer
  • What was the Sumerian system of writing known as?
    6·1 answer
  • Do you believe that, in general, child labor laws were ultimately enacted more as an economic response to adult unemployment as
    10·1 answer
  • Which headline describes a turning point in the war in the Pacific?
    15·2 answers
  • In what ways did the attack on Pearl Harbor influence American foreign policy?
    11·1 answer
  • What is benedict rule
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!