1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Musya8 [376]
3 years ago
8

Compare the 2008 and 2012 turnouts by ethnicity. Next analyze what the comparisons of 2008 and 2012 mean in terms of the politic

al parties. Write a 250-word essay comparing the elections in terms of voter turnout among different voting groups—namely, African Americans, Hispanics, and young people. Explain in your own words how changes (if any) in the voting styles of these groups affected the elections.
HELP PLS!
History
1 answer:
JulijaS [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I found this on the web. I hope it helps you

The demographics of the likely voter sample give an estimate of the relative influence each subgroup will have on the overall vote due to its voter turnout. The figures in the accompanying graph are derived from Gallup survey estimates, which are different from and may not match figures from exit poll surveys that use different methods and different questions to measure these demographic variables.

Gallup identifies likely voters using a series of seven questions that ask about current voting intentions and past voting behavior. The resulting sample of likely voters has proven to give a generally accurate prediction of the final election outcome. For example, in 2004, Gallup's final likely voter estimate (before undecideds were allocated to the candidates) showed George W. Bush with a two-percentage-point advantage over John Kerry in an election Bush won by just over two points. And Gallup's final 2008 estimate showed Barack Obama outpolling John McCain by 11 points, a slight overestimate of Obama's seven-point margin of victory.

The lack of change in the composition of the electorate in recent years is not unexpected, given that there are limits on how great a share of the electorate a subgroup can represent -- mainly its share of the overall U.S. adult population. For example, if 12% of all Americans are black, turnout among blacks would have to be proportionately greater than that of other racial groups for their share of the electorate to exceed 12%. The fact that 11% of likely voters this year are black indicates that turnout among blacks may be slightly less than among other racial groups.

To the extent the electorate looks different now compared with 2004 or 2008, those changes may have as much to do with changes in the larger national adult population as with differential turnout by group this year.

For example, the largest changes in the composition of the electorate compared with the last presidential election concern the partisan affiliation of voters. Currently, 46% of likely voters identify as Democrats or lean Democratic, compared with 54% in 2008. But in 2008, Democrats enjoyed a wide 12-point advantage in party affiliation among national adults, the largest Gallup had seen in at least two decades. More recently, Americans have been about as likely to identify as or lean Republican as to identify as or lean Democratic. Consequently, the electorate has also become less Democratic and more Republican in its political orientation than in 2008. In fact, the party composition of the electorate this year looks more similar to the electorate in 2004 than 2008.

Additionally, the percentage of nonwhite voters, now 20%, has risen significantly since 2004 (15%) -- though it is similar to 2008's 19% -- largely due to the proportionately greater growth of the nonwhite population in the United States over the past decade.

Implications

Thus, given the relatively similar demographic composition of the 2012 and 2008 electorates, the election's outcome may hinge more on how groups vote rather than to what extent they will vote. And most groups are currently less likely to support Obama now than they were in 2008. However, Obama's seven-point margin of victory in the 2008 election leaves him considerable breathing room to lose electoral support yet still win the election.

At this point, though, Gallup Daily tracking of likely voter preferences suggests Obama has lost more support than he could afford to, given his current 50% to 47% deficit to his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney. To close that gap in the final weeks of the campaign, Obama would need to have subgroups favorable to him, such as blacks or young adults, turn out at rates that match or exceed those of groups less favorable to him, or to increase his support among key subgroups even if their turnout remains the same.

Track every angle of the presidential race on Gallup.com's Election 2012 page.

Sign up to get Election 2012 news stories from Gallup as soon as they are published.

Also i have over 1000 points but I still need 8 brainliest to get to the expert rank, so if you would be so kind to give me brainliest then thank you

You might be interested in
True or False. Aryans were part of an Indo-European language family
djverab [1.8K]
Yes aryans were part of an indo-european language family
8 0
2 years ago
Why are federal judges appointed for life?
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

a) To ensure freedom from control by elected officials

Explanation:

Constitutionally (Article III), federal judges are appointed for life. The Constitution gives federal judges employment security so they may resolve cases without public or political pressure. Even if they make unfavorable judgments, federal judges can only be impeached.

They are sheltered from the political process yet being young and inexperienced encourages judges to remain on the bench long after good reason would have retired them. According to Eastman and UT professor Stephen Vladeck, term restrictions might diminish independence and let money influence the system. If judges were obliged to retire at 60, some industry or interest may have employed them later.

3 0
2 years ago
Can you tell the the authors name and the date and the Reliability <br> Pleaseeee
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

emma goss 2002 dont know relibitly sorry if wrong

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What could be used as evidence in proving someone was a witch?
mr_godi [17]
"witchs marks" =scars
Or back in the day they used really bizarre evidence like swim tests, where they believed a witch would float with something pulling them down as a symbol that the water is rejecting their body and prayer tests because witches apparently weren't capable of reciting prayers from the bible  
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose the correct term to complete each definition.
zysi [14]

Answer:

1.sectionalism

2.annexation

3.abolition

4.nullificaton

Explanation:

bc ik

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What type of naval vessel allowed the Germans to not be completely dominated by the British at sea during World War I?
    14·1 answer
  • The sacred writings of Judaism are known as?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Indian Removal Act impact the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • Compare Nat Turner and Fredrick Douglass
    15·1 answer
  • 3Which was the most common form of resistance among enslaved people?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did hitler want to dominate other countries ?
    6·2 answers
  • Virginia and England are what type of noun ?
    13·1 answer
  • What happened to the Nationalists after the Civil War?
    7·2 answers
  • What industry expanded in Texas after World War I?
    9·1 answer
  • World War a rising threat
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!