1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Volgvan
2 years ago
8

why did the 1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance b

etween local, state and national goverment
History
1 answer:
stepladder [879]2 years ago
8 0

1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance between local, state and national goverment in the following way

Explanation:

  • The United States moved from dual federalism to cooperative federalism in the 1930s. National programs would increase the size of the national government and may not be the most effective in local environments. Cooperative federalism does not apply to the Judicial branch of the government.
  • Each level of government is dominant within its own sphere. ... Marble cake federalism – Conceives of federalism as a marble cake in which all levels of government are involved in a variety of issues and programs, rather than a layer cake, or dual federalism, with fixed divisions between layers or levels of government.
  • As a theory, dual federalism holds that the federal and state governments both have power over individuals but that power is limited to separate and distinct spheres of authority, and each government is neither subordinate to nor liable to be deprived of its authority by the other.
  • The first, dual federalism, holds that the federal government and the state governments are co-equals, each sovereign. In this theory, parts of the Constitution are interpreted very narrowly, such as the 10th Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Commerce Clause
  • The advantages of this system are that it protects local areas and jurisdictions from the overreach of the federal government. The framers of the Constitution were afraid that the federal government would have too much power, and this system was a means of preventing that situation from developing.
  • Historically, the definitive example of dual federalism is the United States. ... These states can check the federal government through judicial action. Europe, too, has a system of dual federalism, albeit set up with state traditions. The European Union (EU) is organized into a federalist government with limited powers.

You might be interested in
What do details in the first part of the excerpt tell about the nature of breaking news stories in the 1914 press as compared to
kari74 [83]

In the 1900s, there was the gradual ascent of the information spread by the media as there were traditional media which was slower than the ones we have today.

<h3>Breaking News</h3>

This refers to the sudden news which is of great importance that is reported by a news outlet.

As a result of this, it is much easier to spread breaking news about an event to a wider audience as a result of the social media than it was in the 1900s.

Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview so you could get a better understanding of the concept.

Read more about breaking news here:

brainly.com/question/6824468

5 0
2 years ago
The encomienda system was?
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

The encomienda system was a labor system instituted by the Spanish crown in the American colonies. In this system, a Spanish encomendero was granted a number of native laborers who would pay tributes to him in exchange for his protection

4 0
3 years ago
A citizen says that the U.S. Government does not have the right to defend the country against a foreign attack. Which phrase fro
Vlad1618 [11]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can say the following.

The phrase from the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution rejects that idea is "Establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defense."

When the founding fathers and framers of the United States Constitution met during the Constitutional Convention in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the summer of 1787, they debated so much to agree on the new kind of government for the new nation. In the Preamble, the framers clearly stated that the government had to defend the country against any foreign aggression.

That is why, in the Executive branch, the United States President in the Commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces: Navy, Army, the Air Force, and the Coast Guard.

8 0
2 years ago
Are Muslims zoroastian need help
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:No they are not.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASEEEE HELP FAST!!!! What was the geographical importance of the new capital established by Kublai Khan?
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

Is this for a test?

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes a difference between a democracy and a republic?
    6·2 answers
  • What best describes the glorious revolution
    7·1 answer
  • Explain what it means to have a divine source of power
    5·1 answer
  • What statement best describes the relationship between the programs of the new deal and the end of the Great Depression
    15·2 answers
  • what basic right does the declaration of independence identify as belonging to all people? how do they differ from the rights Lo
    13·1 answer
  • How were gothic cathedrals different from Romanesque churches
    10·1 answer
  • Explain these compromises
    12·1 answer
  • Why does the US President use a different pen for every resolution he signs?
    8·1 answer
  • The U.S. government created the “Rosie the Riveter” campaign to persuade women to
    10·2 answers
  • 11.1. War Communism ​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!