Answer:they felt it unfairly penalized them as grain farmers
Explanation:
They went becouse they thought they were going to find gold. the indians however did not have the gold the spanish wanted.
Answer:
One instance of de facto discrimination was the segregation of interstate buses. The Supreme Court ruled in Morgan v. Virginia in 1946 that such segregation was illegal.
Explanation:
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
Answer:
Deontological
Explanation:
Deontological: In moral philosophy, the term "deontological" is also referred to as deontology, and is described as the "normative ethical theory" that signifies that the "morality" of a specific action needs to be based on whether that specific action itself is considered as wrong or right under a particular series of rules, instead of basing on the result of that action.
In the question above, the designer's approach to ethical decision-making is best characterized as deontological.
