If Khalil scored low on the intuitive function, that means he must score high on the opposite trait, which would be the <u>sensing function.</u>
<u />
<u />
<h3>Intuition vs Sensing</h3>
Both intuition and sensing are functions based on Jungian theories concerning our personalities. Intuition and sensing refer to the way we learn, that is, to how we take in information from the world.
A person who scores high in intuition is someone who learns based on his own perceptions and impressions of the information obtained. A person who scores high in sensing learns from his five senses.
One way that such a difference often shows itself is on people's abilities with their hands. Normally, sensory people are better painters or sculptors, for example. However, we must keep in mind there are exceptions to all cases.
With the information above in mind, we can say Khalil scored high on sensing since he scored low on intuition.
Learn more about intuition here:
brainly.com/question/887641
Answer:
The first one is Past Simple and next is Past Perfect. Personality, I think, that the first is better
Answer:
Yes it is
Explanation:
I've seen. Sorry that is all I can give you.
Answer:
When Orwell relates his experience with the elephant in “Shooting an Elephant” it gives some insight into his own psyche as well as the structure of imperialism. In this moment, he criticizes imperialism, showing that the leaders are controlled by the masses just as much as, if not more so than, the other way around.
He describes himself as being despised by the Burmese people. He is a colonial policeman, and in this role, he is associated with imperial British rule, propped up by the threat of force. (Orwell himself served in the Indian imperial police for a time, so the narrator's voice is likely his own.) When the elephant tears through the bazaar, killing a coolie, the Burmese crowd demands that he shoot and kill it. He does not want to do this, because by the time he arrives on the scene, the elephant has calmed, and no longer poses a threat to anybody. Orwell reflects that, in order to appease the angry crowd, he has to fill the role that they expect of him, which is that of a hated "tyrant." This is the paradoxical nature of empire- he must compromise his morality, become what the Burmese people already think he is, or risk their laughter and scorn. For someone that has already determined that he hates British imperialism, the incident is profoundly unsettling, but in a "roundabout way enlightening." It underscores the duality of empire, a world in which a man like Orwell can, as he says in the account, hold remarkably contradictory feelings:
The incident illustrates that, whatever objections they may have to British rule, imperial officials have to be hated to be respected.
Explanation:
