It would basically be a mess (trust, me I got a very bad grade on a writing prompt way back in elementary school because I was not prepared.
Texting a sibling or friend, and (maybe) writing reminders.
The bird continues to visit his mother once a year and this time he meets her in Tokyo. Shizuka Wantabe guards the secret that her son is alive amid silence with rumors about the birds life, Meanwhile in america in September 1949, Cynthia attends a Reverend Billy Graham revival in LA. She comes away changed. She decides to talk her husband out of divorce and talks Billy into going to hear Graham. Louie resists and eventually gives in, always leaving church services early and angry. One night after hearing Graham talk he feels Christ is talking to him and Louie becomes Christian . He, like Cynthia is changed.
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!