Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Helen made a mistake in the last step.
2^(4/3) / e = (∛(2^4) / e = ∛(16) / e .
It is the cube root of 2^4 not the 4th root of 2^3.
Stephen made a mistake in the first step.
He replaced ln2 by 2 which is evidently wrong (e^ln2 = 2 NOT ln 2).
Answer:
(x+4)^2 =0
Step-by-step explanation:
x2 +8x+16=0
What 2 numbers multiply to 16 and add to 8
4*4 = 16
4+4 =8
(x+4) (x+4) =0
(x+4)^2 =0
Answer:
Yes, there is enough evidence to say the proportions are the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: The proportions are the same.
Alternate hypothesis: The proportions are not the same.
Data given:
p1 = 51% = 0.51
n1 = 200
p2 = 48% = 0.48
n2 = 150
pooled proportion (p) = (n1p1 + n2p2) ÷ (n1 + n2) = (200×0.51 + 150×0.48) ÷ (200 + 150) = 174 ÷ 350 = 0.497
Test statistic (z) = (p1 - p2) ÷ sqrt[p(1-p)(1/n1 + 1/n2) = (0.51 - 0.48) ÷ sqrt[0.497(1-0.497)(1/200 + 1/150)] = 0.03 ÷ 0.054 = 0.556
The test is a two-tailed test. At 0.10 significance level the critical values -1.645 and 1.645
Conclusion:
Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic 0.556 falls within the region bounded by the critical values.
We know is a horizontal line, so, if it passes through 1,-5, it also passes through "whatever", -5, like 20, -5 or 1000000, -5, or -100000000, -5 and so on.
so, let's pick another point say -7, -5, check the picture below, and let's check about the equation that runs through it,
