Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Political Parties.
Answer:
Yes he may prevail
Explanation:
He wants to exercise his civic duty and he has every right to file a suit because he has been taxes indirectly to the city.
Firstly, The farmer does not pay any tax directly to the city because a portion of his farm property is turned over by the county to the city to support the city police department, which indirectly, he is paying tax because this support to the city is categorized indirectly as his tax.
Secondly, His farm property has been vandalized several times over the months and the police didn't do anything about it to improve his situation which calls for attention to why nothing has been done about it despite his support to the city police department.
With the two above paragraphs, he has a point and his also lives in one of the rural communities and the city ordinance provides that only residents of the city may vote, but the city ordinance is always the city ordinance, the law might and might not favor him, he could get payment for the damages on his properties, but it would be quite difficult for him to prevail over the suit because he doesn't live in the city
Answer:
The answer is The Matthew Effect.
Explanation:
This phenomenon takes place when a person preserves or improves a certain status becase he/she is placed in situations that facilitate the process. This term initially applied to socioeconomical status ("the rich get richer"), but has been used in other contexts such as education or recognition. For this reason, the effect is also called accumulated advantage.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Your father's side also provides extended family members
Answer:
I believe it is
Explanation:
military language and religion.
