Answer:
A) That it has social consequences.
Explanation:
I got it right on the edg2020 quiz.
Answer: B) faces
Explanation: Pound is comparing "faces in the crowd" to petals that are laying against a tree branch.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
An explanation of evidence
Explanation:
When we're writing a paragraph (about the theme of a text, for example), we can use the PIE structure. Each of these letters stands for one part of the paragraph:
- P - point - the main idea (the theme);
- I - information/illustration - information that supports (illustrates) the point (like quotes in the given example);
- E - explanation - explanation about how the illustration supports the point.
Based on the given information, we can see that the given paragraph doesn't contain the explanation. We have the theme and examples that illustrate it, but there is no explanation that connects them.
Answer: "A school district can bring in hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue from the ads over the course of several years." & "Ads would need to be limited to those that target adults outside of the school buses and not the children inside."
Explanation:
The sentence "In fact, putting limitations on anything helps make things more beneficial for people." sounds short with no proof or evidence.
"Student(s) may have thought this made a good point that helps support the argument that ads should be allowed on school buses." They may have given some evidence, but it's not the strongest.
"An advertising program can greatly benefit a school district as long as there are limitations put on the ads." This is basically just rewording the claim.
The other two sentences are correct because it shows strong proof of the reasons in a understanding way.
Answer:
False
It’s was four out of five, meaning that one didn’t agree and saying that Crest is ‘superior’ does not rule out other brands because a comparison must be done to justify this statement and the statement does not specify Crest superiority.
:)
