A. 7/3
HOPE IT HELLS U!!!!
Answer:
its a 50 degree angle i think.
Step-by-step explanation:
its a smaller size in scale of the bigger one.
Answers:
A. 6 Large taxis = 42 seats 9 Small taxis = 36 seats = 78 seats in total
B. 6 Large taxis = $498 + 9 Small taxis = $450 498+450= $948
C. 5 Large taxis and 10 Small taxis
Step-by-step explanation:
A. 6 Large taxis = 42 seats 9 Small taxis = 36 seats = 78 seats in total
If I did 8 small taxis the total number of seats would be 74, so I did one small taxi more to make it fair. There would be seats for everyone but 3 seats extra
B. 6 Large taxis = $498 + 9 Small taxis = $450 498+450=948
C. 5 Large taxis and 10 Small taxis
While the more small taxis there are, the more cheaper it is for Max but the less seats there would be for 75 people, So I did 1 more small taxi and 1 less large taxi.
The total number of seats now is 75 seats which is perfect amount for 75 people
So the total cheaper cost would $915 while still maintaining a fair amount of seats which is 75
Answer:
B) Exp. Decay
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the term getting raised to a power is under 1, the function immediately starts going down and approaches negative infinity as x approaches infinity.
Answer:
since -3.73 is less than 1.645, we reject H₀.
Therefore this indicate that the proposed warranty should be modified
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the data in the question;
p" = 13/20 = 0.65
Now the test hypothesis;
H₀ : p = 0.9
Hₐ : p < 0.9
Now lets determine the test statistic;
Z = (p" - p ) / √[p×(1-p)/n]
= (0.65 - 0.9) /√[0.9 × (1 - 0.9) / 20]
= -0.25 / √[0.9 × 0.1 / 20 ]
= -0.25 / √0.0045
= -0.25 / 0.067
= - 3.73
Now given that a = 0.05,
the critical value is Z(0.05) = 1.645 (form standard normal table)
Now since -3.73 is less than 1.645, we reject H₀.
Therefore this indicate that the proposed warranty should be modified
