The great compromise in drafting the new constitution was a plan for states representation in congress.
The great compromise also known as Sherman compromise, the Connecticut compromise, the great compromise of 1787. It was an agreement made between the large and small states which involve how each state would be represented under the constitutions of the United States including the legislature.
Further Explanation
This agreement took place in 1787. The great compromise was as a result of a strong debate among larger and states delegate as to the number of representatives that each state could have in the congress.
The great compromise resulted in the establishment of two chambered of the congress. The house of representatives was also created and it was determined mainly the population of each states.
The bicameral legislature was retained based on the agreement but the upper house was adjusted in order to allow two senators from each state. The agreement was a successful one and it helped in the restructuring of American government. The highly populated states demands were met while the less populous states demand and interest was also protected.
Before the constitutional convention of 1787, states like virginal were favored in the congressional representation based on its larger population while state with less population wanted equal representation.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS:
- great compromise
- bicameral legislature
- american government
- house of representatives
- senators
Explanation:
As October 2015 drew to a close, international media attention focused once again on South Africa as Oscar Pistorius was released from jail after serving 10 months of his five-year sentence for killing Reeva Steenkamp. Fewer column inches were dedicated to the student protests which reclaimed movement politics for the ‘born free’ generation, those born after the fall of the apartheid government in 1994.
Answer:
The two citations provide information on how to locate the sources.
Explanation: Got 100% on edge
Answer:
Businessmen in the United States and Europe know Japanese industry as an important supplier, customer, and competitor. But they should also know it as a teacher. Three important sets of ideas we can learn from Japan are described in this article. They could have a far-reaching impact on the quality of our executive decision making, corporate planning, worker productivity, and management training.
Explanation:
