To be honest all of these answers are wrong (for being the main reason)
<span>When in 1931 Japan invaded Manchuria, Great Britain and France, the only League members at the time with significant regional ‘clout’, proved unwilling and would perhaps in any case have been unable to impose effective sanctions on the aggressor. Next, in 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia in whose fate no other great power had any direct interest. This, it was widely recognised, was the decisive test case for the League. For Great Britain and France clearly did on this occasion have the capacity to defeat Italy if matters came to an all-out war. But in neither London nor Paris was there sufficient support for the imposition of anything more vigorous than partial economic sanctions (which themselves were lifted in 1936). The British cabinet was satisfied that they could not risk the loss of even part of their fleet in a war with Italy at a time when their possessions in the Far East were thought to be menaced by Japan and when the US administration was seen to be hamstrung by congressional neutrality legislation. Similarly, the French held that war with Italy for the sake of Abyssinia would be quixotic at a time when all French forces were thought to be needed for a possible early showdown with Nazi Germany. Abyssinia was accordingly incorporated into the Italian empire in 1936. As a body for resisting international aggression the League had thus effectively perished. It continued to exist in a moribund condition until the end of the Second World War when it was formally replaced by the United Nations.
</span>
If this is multiple choice then just go with B)
Answer:
Explanation :The British were able to conquer
India by exploiting its diversity. Even when Mughal power was at
its height, India was home to many people and cultures. As
Mughal power crumbled, India became fragmented. Indians with
different traditions and dozens of different languages were not
able to unite against the newcomers. The British took advantage
of Indian divisions by encouraging competition and disunity
among rival princes. Where diplomacy or intrigue did not work,
the British used their superior weapons to overpower local rulers.They used the country for their natural resources. Missionaries and British government officals controlled India
The answer is D because it would cause you to be pulled to that country.
I’m not sure what you’re asking but here’s what i found and i hope it helps you.
The Indian removal act was signed into law on May 28 in 1830. the meant the president could negotiate with southern tribes for removal to federal territory west in exchange for white settlement
i found this online so it might not be correct but i hope it helps you.
