Answer: whereas NONCOMPETITIVE inhibition occurs when an inhibitor binds to a regulatory site on the enzyme that is separate and distinct from the active site noncompetitive inhibition
Explanation:
In a noncompetitive inhibition an inhibitor tends to bind the enzymes in a site that is away from the active site and can sometimes block the active site.
The active site based on biology is the site of an enzyme in which the substrate molecules bind and go through a chemical reaction.
The answer to this would be A. True
I hope this answer was able to help you, have a nice day! :)
Answer: Smoking is an action that can be viewed from various perspectives.
Explanation:
Smoking has been present in society for a long period. You can appreciate the role that this action has played and what it can play to a certain extent. From a social perspective, smoking is a social disease. People who smoke are usually in a group where they share this interest and although they may be aware of the damage that smoking can cause, this does not mean that they will quit smoking for some time.
Smoking not only hurts the person who smokes but also the one who is nearby, where one is called active smoking and a passive smoker. The passive smoker is equally likely to develop diseases caused by smoking if he is close to smokers, and it seems that many of these do not know it and only see it from the point where it only hurts the active smoker.
One of the causes for which people do not quit smoking although they know that it can harm is due to the little credibility they have. They are aware that it hurts, but not to the point that they can leave it. The addiction is also involved. People who have tried smoking have developed withdrawal symptoms, where their body exhibits symptoms of anxiety about not having what satisfies them.
In this regard, it is not a matter of judging the person who smokes but who is aware of the serious damage it can cause to health. It has been found in various scientific studies as people who smoke are more likely to develop diseases such as cancer and other problems that can affect health.
From another point of view, people can see smoking as a normal activity as well as having a drink or exercising, it is something that the person performs to seek well-being, but smoking can have greater consequences than those mentioned above.
Looking at it from a psychological point of view, smoking can be a way of dealing with the situations of daily life. Some people exercise, others meditate and others resort to smoking to relax and get ahead with the situations they are dealing with. While it is true that it is not good to judge others for the things they do, people must take responsibility and understand the consequences that each action can bring.
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer:
to create new laws I think
Explanation:
