I think the answer would be B, because our world could become overpopulated, which is very likely.
Hope I helped!
~Mschmindy
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
Answer:
Correct answer is D. were enslaved states
.
Explanation:
A is not correct because all of them were states since the beginning of war, including West Virginia that became state when Virginia seceded from the Union.
B is not correct as this were the border states that stayed within the Union.
C is not correct as they were actually the factor that was decisive for the outcome of the war.
D is correct as although they were part of Union, they didn't not prohibited slavery, and Lincoln was cautious with that question regarding their role.
If the head of the department is elected by the governor then first, the governor will have an influence over who the head of the department is, and second, it will mean that this person will have to seek approval of the governor - this will support cooperation.
On the other hand, being elected in their own right will support independence.
